I'm not a committer, but I prefer 'deferred'.
On Mar 8, 2005, at 10:21 AM, Michael Gloegl wrote:
I think we made a big mistake by re-using the word “lazy” for attribute-level lazy fetching. People think that <many-to-one lazy=”false”/> will disable proxying.
Does anyone know another term we could use?
What about something like "deferred", call it "deferred property loading" ?
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click
_______________________________________________
hibernate-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
---- Nick Heudecker Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 312.420.8217 http://www.systemmobile.com
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ hibernate-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
