Ah yes! Forgot that it already knows about the SF to which it is bound via its constructor. So really the only changes needed here is to the "static portion" of ThreadLocalSessionContext.
Well, it's a trivial implementation. We should either include it or at the very least post it to the Wiki. If we add it to the distro, then at least I'd have more then 3 things in that new package :) I could even refactor the Synchronization into a top-level class; then I'd have 5 things in that package :)) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Bauer Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 9:25 AM To: Hibernate development Subject: Re: [Hibernate] ThreadLocalSessionContext javadoc inconsistency Steve Ebersole wrote: > Here's another concern with the current impl for > ThreadLocalSessionContext: the static accessors. Basically the way > this is setup right now, users will nt be able to use this > simultaneously for multiple session-factories... Well, I'd say that this is one of the "implement your own SessionContext" cases. It would be the same but with a Map of ThreadLocals and SF name on all methods, right? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel