Any specific reason why
hibernate.bytecode.provider
does not consider the value as a class name (if the shortcuts cglib and
javassist are not resolved)?
That would solve your problem and put it to the users shoulders
Steve Ebersole wrote:
So now that we have the BytecodeProvider abstraction, does it make sense
to allow no lazy-load capabilities for simplistic apps? Something like
a NoOpBytecodeProvider which performs no type of class enhancement?
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
_______________________________________________
hibernate-devel mailing list
hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
hibernate-devel mailing list
hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
