> And now I'm thinking about Character[] > Mapping a array of Character into a VARCHAR does not make sense to me > since there is no notion of null elements in a VARCHAR AFAIK. > The RI does that however. What do you think?
> Character[] and Byte[] has to be supported as per the spec, but they do > not make much sense to me. In principle I agree with you; but since EJB3 does not have a typesystem that allows you to choose which type of column you want to persist to it becomes hard for them ;) The question I think should be found to find out how they handle arrays with nulls in it ? But I think it at least should be challenged. -- -- Max Rydahl Andersen callto://max.rydahl.andersen Hibernate [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hibernate.org JBoss Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
