Israel:
A Jews-only state- Part III
By:
John Lynch
April 7, 2005
http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/review/article_full_story.asp?service_ID=7847
In America,
the Zionist domination of the media is so great that it is almost on the verge
of becoming a 'Jews-only' industry. In American politics, the Zionists are
taking over more and more departments of state.
"The neoconservatives are the greatest threat America
has ever faced, and they control the Office of the President, the Office of the
Vice President, the Department of State, the Department of Defense, and the
police-state apparatus known as "Homeland Security." (Paul Craig
Roberts 'Outfoxed by bin Laden'.
The chances of a Muslim or an Arab person getting a
job in an American administration are virtually zero. If current trends
continue then we are headed for a 'Jews-only' American state where the only non-Jews permitted
will be Shabbat goys who support everything done by Ariel Sharon.
It might be argued that the above criticisms of the
Jews-only state, with its Jews-only laws, Jews-only rights, Jews-only
cemeteries, Jews-only property ownership, Jews-only roads running between
Jews-only settlements/towns/cities, Jews-only immigration, Jews-only
employment, Jews-only marriages, Jews-only religion, Jews-only international
laws, Jews-only taboos, openly racist Jewish politicians, etc. might have some
merit but this is ruined by the use of the word Jew which suggests such
criticisms are at the very least anti-Semitic if not racist. Kathleen and bill
Christison avoid any charge of anti-Semitism or racism by talking about
"Israeli-only settlements, Israeli-only roads" (Kathleen and Bill
Christison 'On Israel/Palestine An
Exchange with Bennie Morris'.
But, as has been suggested above, this is not
technically correct. Although Palestinian- Israelis are theoretically allowed
to travel on these roads, in practice this is not possible because the roads
link one Jews-only settlement/town/city to another. It is much more accurate to
say that they are Jews-only roads running between Jews-only settlements.
But surely, it might be argued, the use of the phrase
"Jews-only" is wrong since it condemns all Jewish people around the
world for what is being done in their name by the Zionist state in Palestine.
Aren't
these "Jews-only" criticisms blatantly wrong because they have got
nothing to do with Jews around the world? With some notable exceptions on what
is regarded as the political extremes, no mainstream Jewish organization
anywhere around the world has demanded that the Zionist state abides by UN
resolutions, or that it gives up its weapons of mass destruction in the same
way as these organizations demanded such things of Saddam. No criticisms have
been made of the Zionist state's
Jews-only immigration or Jews-only settlements or Jews-only marriages or
Jews-only property.
In other words, virtually all Jews around the world
support the Jews-only nature of the Zionist state in Palestine and the Zionist state's flouting of international law.
Kathleen Christison paints an accurate picture of the
nature of the Jewish support for the Zionist state. She starts off by talking
about the views of the Jewish historian Benny Morris. "This was a day or
two after this paragon of dispassionate Israeli scholarship had expostulated in
an interview published in Ha'aretz
on the benefits (if you're Jewish)
of ethnic cleansing, the critical miscalculation of David Ben-Gurion in not
having completed the total ethnic cleansing of Palestine from the Mediterranean
to the Jordan River in 1948 when he had a chance, and the barbarity of Arab and
Muslim culture. "The Arab world as it is today is barbarian," Morris
declared. Islamic and Arab culture is "a world in which human life doesn't have the same value as it does in the West,"
in which freedom and democracy are alien, in which there are "no moral
inhibitions." He was speaking in sweeping terms, of entire cultures, of
the mass of individuals in the Arab and the Muslim worlds, not merely of
governments that are oppressive or undemocratic. Palestinians in particular,
Morris believes, are barbaric, "a very sick society," and should be
treated "the way we treat individuals who are serial killers. . . . Something
like a cage has to be built for them." (Kathleen Christison 'American Jewish sensitivities to criticism of Israel'.
Morris's
comments are blatantly anti-Palestinian and racist, and yet he regards himself
as still being a leftist. If leftist Jews can hold such views then just imagine
the views of those on the right of the political spectrum. Christison
concludes, "Benny Morris - who still considers himself a leftist, still
favors establishment of a Palestinian state in part of Palestine, still exposes
Israeli atrocities against the Palestinians in his examination of early Israeli
history - is one of those people Meir Keohane was describing, and he speaks for
large numbers of his fellow Israelis and his fellow Jews throughout the world.
Morris's blunt soul-bearing has
lifted the last barrier of propriety to the open _expression_ of raw Arab hatred.
One longs for some gigantic outcry of opposition or disgust over this
confession of deep bigotry, but there has been none. Except for a few letters
to the editor of Ha'aretz from
American Jews, the interview has aroused little attention in the
Jewish-American community: no denunciation, no shock, little or no discussion
on any but the most progressive Jewish e-mail lists. You have to assume that,
however awkward Morris's blunt
language may be, he is speaking for a large segment of American Jews who say
they oppose the occupation, say they hate Sharon, say they hate Israel's oppression of the Palestinians, but who do
nothing about any of these things and who in the end would not grieve, either
for the Palestinians or for the Jewish soul, if Israel wiped the Palestinians
off the map." (Kathleen Christison 'American
Jewish sensitivities to criticism of Israel'.
Michael Neumann reaches similar conclusions to Christison but from a
philosophical standpoint, "Do we want to say it is antisemitic to accuse,
not just the Israelis, but Jews generally of complicity in these crimes against
humanity? Again, maybe not, because there is a quite reasonable case for such
assertions. Compare them, for example, to the claim that Germans generally were
complicit in such crimes. This never meant that every last German, man, woman,
idiot and child, were guilty. It meant that most Germans were.
Their guilt, of course, did not consist in shoving
naked prisoners into gas chambers. It consisted in support for the people who
planned such acts, or - as many overwrought, moralistic Jewish texts will tell
you - for denying the horror unfolding around them, for failing to speak out
and resist, for passive consent. Note that the extreme danger of any kind of
active resistance is not supposed to be an excuse here. Well, virtually no Jew
is in any kind of danger from speaking out. And speaking out is the only sort
of resistance required. If many Jews spoke out, it would have an enormous
effect.
But the overwhelming majority of Jews do not, and in
the vast majority of cases, this is because they support Israel. Now
perhaps the whole notion of collective responsibility should be discarded;
perhaps some clever person will convince us that we have to do this. But at
present, the case for Jewish complicity seems much stronger than the case for
German complicity. So if it is not racist, and reasonable, to say that the
Germans were complicit in crimes against humanity, then it is not racist, and
reasonable, to say the same of the Jews.
And should the notion of collective responsibility be
discarded, it would still be reasonable to say that many, perhaps most adult
Jewish individuals support a state that commits war crimes, because that's just true. So if saying these things is
antisemitic, than it can be reasonable to be anti-Semitic. In short, the real
scandal today is not anti-Semitism but the importance it is given. Israel has
committed war crimes. It has implicated Jews generally in these crimes, and
Jews generally have hastened to implicate themselves.
This has provoked hatred against Jews. Why not? Some
of this hatred is racist, some isn't,
but who cares? Why should we pay any attention to this issue at all?"
(Michael Neumann 'What is
Anti-Semitism?'
The jews-only policies outlined above are the
manifestations of the perennial Jewish belief in their chosenness, their
superiority over all other races on Earth. As Hannah ardent once argued,
"If you do not dissent then you consent."
Also...
- Israel:
A Jews-only state- Part I
- Israel:
A Jews-only state- Part II
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/internationalnews/
Please visit
also: www.apm-ram.org
Please see also: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/
Please read and feel free to forward, print, and
publish.
We would like to apologize for any repeated messages,
and any typing or grammatical errors.
We act because we believe in this quote:
“ You can fool some of the people all the time, and all of the
people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all the
time”
Disclaimer
This material is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes.
We are committed to free knowledge, unless otherwise
indicated, the opinions, personal articles or news analysis expressed on this
e-mails are not necessarily those of the sender. This e-mail has been compiled
in good faith. It is our condition that, in exchange for this free information,
you the receiver accept that we will not be liable for any action you, the user
take based on the information in this e-mail. It is essential that you, the
user verify any and/or all information contained herein before making your
final decision. This e-mail does not necessarily endorse the ideas or
presentation of ideas of the sites it links to and with. We make no
representations about any linked web site's
accuracy, completeness, and authenticity. We firmly believe in the Freedom of
Speech. We believe in civilized exchange of ideas and thoughts. We will hold
any one trying to damage our image legally responsible before the courts and
will keep ourselves the right to pursue the perpetrators to the maximum law
limit. If you do not agree with this disclaimer or would like to stop receiving
our e-mails, please unsubscribe, if you find that this e-mail is a good source
of knowledge and would like to invite any others, please feel free.
