The writer is a Graduate in Chemistry from London university. More muslims writers should step forward like Yasmin, and to influence the west public opinion, which usually dictated by the anti-islamic western media.
 
 
 

My Response to “The Sun” Newspaper Editor

Yamin Zakaria

London, UK

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Below is my response to Mr. Tom Newton Dunn, Defence Editor of The Sun Newspaper, and I have placed his response below mine.  Mr Tom Dunn responded to my original article which can be seen at:

http://usa.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/15094/

 

The entire exchange can also be seen at:

http://www.cdlr.net/English/cdlrboard/showthread.php?s=&postid=1777#post1777

 


To Mr. Tom Newton Dunn

Defence Editor

The Sun

 

Thanks for your response. It came as no surprise that my original article [1] would not get published; because, The Sun, is the most rabid anti-Islamic tabloid to disseminate hate-filled propaganda against the Muslim community. One of the real difficulties of upholding genuine free speech is that you have to publish the opposing views no matter how painful! It is easy to constantly lecture a community about their lack of free speech, especially after using it as a pretext to hurl insults at them and then hypocritically denying them that same free speech to respond.

 

I would like to bring to your attention the following points you raised, and hope that may clarify the factual inaccuracies on both sides. I have addressed them in their order of merit.

 

A)                Pictures  

 

You claim that publishing the pictures was in the Public interest, as it sends: “very powerful statement of how much Iraq has changed in the last two years.” I do not understand how showing semi-nude pictures of Saddam Hussein would reflect the changes in Iraq! Or is that because, your paper likes to communicate and market itself, in terms of nudity.

 

If you wanted to show the changes in Iraq there are plenty of vivid images within the country. For example, you could have shown the destruction of almost all the civilian infrastructure by the US bombs, which are now being contracted out to the American firms (e.g. Bechtel, Halliburton) which the media calls ‘helping’ the Iraqis. How about showing in contrast, the Oil ministries that were never hit by any of the US bombs, a miracle I guess! You also could have shown how the Americans and British forces surpassed Saddam Hussein in torturing prisoners in Abu-Ghraib and elsewhere, while they fly the flag of human rights, Amnesty report today supports this! But showing such images and reporting on such facts is perhaps, boring for your readers and challenging for your journalistic craft and Zionist Rupert would not be pleased with declining sales revenue.  

 

As for the reason why the Middle East was unconcerned, a reasonable explanation is that they are demoralised. I would say they have sufficient cause with so much war, destruction and humiliation. The same silence was seen after Abu-Ghraib, so would you say the entire Middle East was not concerned? Hence silence does not mean approval and I can assure you that there is genuine anger building up.

 

The international news agencies you cite, the vast majority are from the West, even those in the Arab countries are virtually run and managed by the West by proxy, the only one with some level independence is Al-Jazeera, which, for its troubles, is bombed, its journalists harassed and murdered by US troops.

 

B)    Who are the terrorists?

 

Please remember that there are terrorists and there are State Terrorists. Like there are suicide bombers and mass murderers. The latter deploys the latest high-tech weapons on towns and cities, schools, colleges, farmers and even their sheeps (John Pilger’s documentary). It is estimated by Johns Hopkins University's, Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, that 100,000 or more civilians in Iraq have been killed by the US and coalition forces. Do you not remember the wanton slaughter of retreating civilians on the road to Basra in 1991? What about the mass slaughter of civilians in Fallujah and recently in Al-Qa’im? Which the British media deliberately did not investigate thoroughly, despite reports from doctors and independent organisations, all confirming heinous crimes against civilians and the use of the banned chemical weapons. Yes we finally found those WMDs. Like your ancestor Winston Churchill your American cousins have used them on those sand-niggers, spreading a lively terror!

 

Your laughable reference to the killings of civilians by the Iraqi resistance is an example of how detached you are from the reality as you have failed to take into account the magnitude of the victims from state terrorism (100,000 and rising), and you know the Iraqi resistance can not compete with your scale of “liberation”!

 

Furthermore, you put the effect before the cause. Let us remind ourselves of the cause. There were no bombs falling on Iraqi civilians prior to the illegal and criminal invasion of Iraq. Yes, it was illegal, even Kofi Anan openly stated that the war was a clear violation of the UN charter. As for the killings by the Iraqi resistance, most of the victims are collaborators, some are unfortunately ‘genuine’ collateral damage, and don’t forget there is the counter insurgency run by the CIA “death squads,” which you and your paper have remained silent about.  Lest you forget, it is the right of every occupied nation to resist an occupier, or would Britain bend over if UN resolutions were passed against it, and foreign armies walked in? I think not, and the Sun would be the first to lead the calls for resistance!

 

C)    Iraqi Majority

 

When you refer to the “significant majority” of Iraqis, are they the same significant majority that failed to fill Ferdous Square for the staged toppling of the Saddam statute. Perhaps it is like the same manufactured majority that elected Bush to power in Florida 20000. The truth is, if the majority were in support of the US led invasion, Bush and Blair would be roaming the streets of Baghdad, not sneaking in and out like oil-pirates and thieves. Yes thieves, as we know billions of oil revenue are still unaccounted for. Even the BBC has reported US soldiers stealing from old Iraqi women. And if the majority supported the US, the Iraqi resistance could not operate and flourish in Iraq. There are many daily attacks from dozens of different groups - most ordinary Iraqis who want the Americans out.

  

I have not been to Iraq recently but as a Muslim who has travelled and lived in the Arab/Islamic societies and somebody who understands the Arab culture, streets and minds I have an advantage over you. I know what the vast majority of the Islamic world thinks and they share my opinions, not yours, which you arrogantly proclaim. Even your own mass media will testify that the anti-Western sentiment from Morocco to Indonesia is growing by the day, fuelled by the events in Iraq amongst other injustices.    

 

The fact that you have flown into Iraq and stayed at the Palestine Hotel does not make you an expert on the wants and desires of the Iraqi people!  You have not lived amongst the people, shared their joys and their sorrows, you do not share the majority religion and culture and have definitely not stepped outside your comfort zone. Why? Because you know very well you would have come back headless. I suggest you watch the BBC documentary by Sean Langham (a real journalist that steps out of cosy stereotypes and jingoism), he gives you a good insight into their feelings, and this is well before the gruesome events of Abu-Ghraib, Fallujah and Al Qa’im took place.

 

As for your reference to the moral responsibility, please spare us your fake benevolence. We did not see much enthusiasm for that moral responsibility in Rwanda, apartheid South Africa and more recently in Uzbekistan! I wonder why? Do you really think we are so stupid that we should see profit seeking capitalist states like US and UK as charitable institutions? The Islamic world clearly does not want your military bases, does not want your dictators over us and does not want your values of democracy force fed through the barrel of a gun. As a peaceful visitor you will always be welcome and enjoy the hospitality that we are known for, just like you, we want our destiny in our hands. 

 

D) Facts and History

 

You talk about facts and 30 years of history. If you know about history you will know that during the reign of Saddam, when most of the oppression was committed, your country and the US made a good deal of money by selling him weapons knowing how those weapons were being used. Your support and weapons sales makes you fully complicit with Saddam, just as in a murder the one providing the gun and support, is an accomplice. Where was the Sun when millions were dieing in a proxy war, fought for you, against Iran? Where was your service to the people? This shows clearly you are a shameless hypocrite.

 

E) What is The Sun ‘Newspaper’?

 

The final point about your ‘newspaper’ not being pornographic, of course topless women and seedy stories are not pornographic, because you are continuously setting higher standards for what constitutes porn! I still remember the childhood joke in my school, when the kids used to say Sun is a paper that you do not read but simply look at. As for being xenophobic your reputation precedes you, this is a perception of your paper not just held by Muslims, but the general British public, born from decades of Sun reporting. And with fascist minded columnists like Richard LittleJohn the likes of Nick Griffin could easily retire. If I remember correctly he actually praised him on BBC Newsnight. If you doubt my words about Sun’s reputation, then commission an independent survey of perceived Sun values, and let the facts speak for themselves.

 

Yamin Zakaria

London, UK

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 


 

[1] http://usa.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/15094/

 

 

 

Yamin,

 

Thanks for your article. I'm afraid we won't be publishing it because it is so full of factual inaccuracies. To correct but a few, neither I nor The Sun are xenophobic, racist or pornographic. We resent such childish and unfounded insults from you too. Secondly, the photos of Saddam may well have humiliated him, but we believe it was substantially in the public's interest to see them as a very powerful statement of how much Iraq has changed in the last two years.

But much more importantly, they did not at all humiliate "the entire Arab-Muslim nation" as you woefully suggest. On the contrary, according to international news agencies and broadcast mediums, the significant majority of Iraqis were delighted to see them, while the reaction across the Middle East region is best described as unconcerned.

Thirdly, it is not the coalition forces who are killing innocent Iraqis in their dozens on a daily basis, but a group of warped terrorists who seem to share your views.

Lastly, I wonder by what you write if you have actually ever been to Iraq recently? If you have been there like me - 12 times in fact since March 2003 - you'd discover that the overwhelming majority of the population were delighted the US and Britain finally stepped up to their moral responsibilities, as the Iraqi poeple see it, and deposed a hated and murderous regime.

I would argue that your sympathies are not only misplaced and deeply unwanted by the Iraqi people, but based on a very deluded ignorance of the country and the facts that suround its history over the last 30 years. Moreover, to continue to hold them is an insult to Saddam's many millions of victims.

I hope this has gone some way to correcting you.

Yours,

Tom

 

Tom Newton Dunn

Defence Editor
The Sun
Office 0207 782 4118
Mobile 07720 353804
Pager 07659 120446




--------------------------------------------------------------------------

All views expressed herein belong to the individuals concerned and do not in any way reflect the official views of Hidayahnet unless sanctioned or approved otherwise.

If your mailbox clogged with mails from Hidayahnet, you may wish to get a daily digest of emails by logging-on to http://www.yahoogroups.com to change your mail delivery settings or email the moderators at [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the title "change to daily digest".




Yahoo! Groups Links

Kirim email ke