Had any member of the opposition voice the very thought as did former PM, Dr. Mahathir, it would have been brushed aside without a single thought. At best, the government and its supported would have hurled the opposition as being irrational and lacking business acumen. Now, dare we hope for an opposition voice from within - irrespective of their agenda?
Raja Petra Kamarudin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Media statement by Ronnie Liu Tian Khiew, DAP International Secretary and NGO bureau chief
In defending Proton and its CEO Tengku Mahaleel Tengku Ariff in a media conference on Tuesday, Protonâs adviser Dr Mahathir Mohamad has also taken the opportunity to attack Rafidah Aziz and also the Malaysian Government.
The former prime minister once again expressed his unhappiness over high number of Approved Permits (APs) being issued every year.
Dr Mahathir has earlier claimed that importing cheap Korean cars using APs have affected the sales of Proton cars badly. But the Prime Minister Abdullah Ahamd Badawi who refused to reveal details of APs holders claimed that there were many factors for the decline of Proton cars, and one of them was âProton has not become a truly competitive car makerâ after all these years of protection.
On Tuesday, Dr Mahathir revealed that out of the 67,000 APs issued in 2004, 54,400 were given to 20 Bumiputrasâ companies and 12,600 APs were given to another 82 Bumiputrasâ companies (www.malaysia.tv). He called it âirregularitiesâ and claimed that many Bumiputras were unhappy over such irregularities. One wonders whether he has taken into account of the feelings of Non- Bumiputras who were not given a single AP.
He said many of these APs were sold for clean profits as much as RM30, 000 each. The Government must have lost at least RM2 billion in revenue on imported cars in 2004 alone.
Dr Mahathir is right. A Harrier owner may want to know that out of the RM160,000 he or she paid for buying one, as much as RM45,000 went to the AP holder. The landed price of a Harrier is âusuallyâ around RM30, 000. Only about RM25, 000 was paid as tax to the Government.
Dr Mahathir also questioned why the Government has not put a stop to Korean cars which were imported to Malaysia with an under-declared value- at a cost âlower than the price of raw materialsâ.
He was also unhappy with Rafidah for endorsing the 40% local content benchmark for national car status during AFTA negotiations without consulting the Prime Minister and the Cabinet.
He claimed that such benchmark has put Proton in a disadvantaged position compared to other national cars with a much lower local content. He questioned why Naza Ria was classified as national car as the MPV has only 18% local content at the time it was launched by him.
The Minister of International Trade and Industry Rafidah Aziz has chosen not to respond. That gives an impression to the Malaysian public that what the former PM said about her must have some truths in it.
But the Proton saga is really a failure of Dr Mahathir. As a prime minister, he has practically making full use of whatever national resources he could gather ( not to mention artificial tariffs and regulations) to give his pet project-Proton- an unfair advantage for some twenty years. He should not blame anybody but himself.
DAP and many economists have warned him of the grave consequences of pushing ahead with such an unviable project from day one. We know the national car project is doomed to fail simply because of serious lack of economy of scale. But Dr Mahathir was too egoistic to listen to the opposition. Today, he was forcing himself to step out of retirement to fight for the survival of his pet project.
Dr Mahathir was not telling the truth when he claimed that Proton is still making profit. There is currently a stock of 200,000 units unsold according to Tengku Mahaleel.He was also not totally honest on his claim that there were international buyers interested in buying Proton.
Dr Mahathir is a major stumbling block for Protonâs survival. No one would be interested to buy Proton as long as Dr Mahathir refuses to lose the controlling stake to foreigners. It does not make any business sense for any international car maker to own a smaller share in such a âstrugglingâ brand in a small market.
Volkswagen last year agreed a partnership deal with Proton that aimed to boost its presence in Southeast Asian markets. The deal did not involve taking equity stakes.
In March, Volkswagen said it would start assembling its Passat mid-sized model in Malaysia this year with Proton and add the subcompact Fox model in 2006.
In an interview in early June with German daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), VW chief executive Bernd Pischetsrieder said the company would consider taking a stake in Proton only once VW finishes its plans for the coming five to seven years.
When asked whether it would use its own treasury shares to pay for a stake in Proton, he replied, "I don't really think so."
A spokesman for Volkswagen said, "These statements in the FAZ are still valid", without commenting further (Reuters).
The only way for Proton to survive is to quickly look for an international car maker/ buyer to be a major partner. If VW and other international car makers are really interested, Dr Mahathir should not insist of holding controlling stake.
Itâs a catch 22 situation for Proton. Either lose face or lose money. And it appears that Dr Mahathir is still not ready to âlose faceâ. He will try whatever he could to hold on to the grip on Proton. Believe it or not, itâs âdoing it out of loveâ in his own words.
Letâs take a at some nuggets of information to understand why Proton may not survive stiff competitions from Perodua, Naza, Inokom and other international brands by 2008 ( on top of the problems created by APs) â¦
Nuggets of information
⢠Toyota Passo, Daihatsu Boon and Perodua Myvi are 3 similar cars that practice platform sharing. The engine and the chassis are the same for these 3 models.
⢠Toyota has shares in Daihatsu. Daihatsu has shares in Perodua. Apparently according to Dr. M, the Japanese have a 51% stake in Perodua. The joint development of the above 3 models gives these manufacturers economy of scale advantage in terms of production costs.
⢠In Malaysia, Toyota Avanza, Perodua Kembara DVVT and Perodua Myvi VVTi models share the same 1298cc K3-VE Dynamic Variable Valve Timing (similar to VTEC) engine.
⢠Toyota invested some RM21 million in the Perodua factory so that Perodua can assemble the Toyota Avanza to meet the stringent Toyota quality standards. Apparently their defect rate is only 0.2 per car.
⢠The Perodua Kancil was based on the most successful selling `keiâ car in Japan, the Daihatsu Mira.
⢠The Perodua Kelisa is based on the Daihatsu Cuore.
⢠The Perodua Kembara is based on the Daihatsu Terios.
⢠The Perodua Kenari is based on the Daihatsu Move.
⢠The Proton Saga, Proton Saga Aeroback, Proton Knight, Proton Saga Megavalve, Proton Saga Megavalve Aeroback, Proton Iswara, Proton Iswara Aeroback, Proton Wira, Proton Wira Aeroback and Proton Waja were based on several variations of the Mitsubishi Lancer.
⢠The Proton Satria and Proton Satria GTi are based on the Mitsubishi Colt/ Cyborg.
⢠The Proton Putra is based on the Mitsubishi Colt/ Mirage.
⢠The miserable failure, Proton Tiara, was the Citroen AX.
⢠The Proton Juara is based on the Mitsubishi Box.
⢠The Proton Waja 1800cc reputedly uses the Renault Megane engine.
⢠The Proton Savvy 1200cc sources its engine from the Renault Clio.
⢠The Proton Perdana 2000cc and 2000cc V6 are based on the Mitsubishi Eterna. Apparently the Eterna was not a popular model in Japan.
⢠Proton factory assembles/manufactures the car. Eon and USPD were appointed dealers. In the beginning Eon sold the sedans and USPD sold the hatchbacks. USPD ceased to exist when Proton bought it over and now operates under the name Proton Edar. Eon is now called a super dealer (whatever that meansâ¦.).
⢠Proton vehicles sold by the dealers come with accessory packages that are generally overpriced. If a customer refuses to accept the accessory package, he will have to wait months for the delivery of his car. This seems to be a simple means of discouraging the consumer from exercising his right to refuse the imposed accessory package. If the general strategy is to sell Proton cars on the premise of a low price (in relation to the competition), then why do the dealers inflate the price with overpriced accessories?
⢠If the dealers want to make money out of the accessories, then they should not blatantly equip the car with cheap accessories and then overcharge the consumer. The consumer is now more informed and can judge good quality. If the accessories are cheap and damage or break easily then Proton will lose the goodwill, faith and trust of the consumer e.g. the defective power window issue. If the accessories fitted are of good quality, the consumer would most likely want them. Simply because if he accepts the accessory package then he does not have to spend a lump sum on the accessories and can pay for them in installments.
⢠Power windows that continuously fail are supplied by local vendors. There is talk that the local vendors supply such low quality products because they have to compensate for the âhidden costâ (more discreet than the word bribes) that they have to pay to remain as suppliers.
Ronnie Liu Tian Khiew
--
Posted by Raja Petra Kamarudin to MT-surat at 7/08/2005 09:00:00 AM
Parti keADILan Rakyat website http://www.keadilanrakyat.org/
Parti keADILan Rakyat network http://www.keadilan-rakyat.com/
Yahoo! Messenger NEW - crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
All views expressed herein belong to the individuals concerned and do not in any way reflect the official views of Hidayahnet unless sanctioned or approved otherwise.
If your mailbox clogged with mails from Hidayahnet, you may wish to get a daily digest of emails by logging-on to http://www.yahoogroups.com to change your mail delivery settings or email the moderators at [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the title "change to daily digest".
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "hidayahnet" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
