hehehe....ana tak pasti apa hamka kata. Ana pun memang kurang membaca bab sejarah yg dok serang ulama. Cuma yg ana hairan...kita yg duduk kat Malaysia ni boleh dapat maklumat tu..kata wahabi ni sesatlah, ibnu taimiyah rosak akidah lah....tapi macamana Prof Dr Yusuf Al-Qardawi yg merupakan pengerusi majlis ulama dunia, juga pengurusi bagi majlis fatwa eropah/amerika malah duduk di bumi arab....boleh tak tahu perkara ni. Apa semua ulama-ulama seluruh dunia yg bersidang bersama beliau tak bagi tau ke yg wahabi ni sesat...sampai Dr. Al-Qardawi ni boleh bagi kredit dan pengiktirafan pada Ibn Taimiyah rh dan Syeikh Mohd Abd Wahab rh.
Sebagai contoh, jika antum baca kitab "fiqh aulawiyat (fiqh keutamaan)" karangan Dr. Yusuf al-qardawi, pada bab 11 (kalau tak silap), tentang tokoh-tokoh ulama, antum akan lihat macamana Al-Qardawi mengiktiraf serta menyebut Syeikh Mohd Abd Wahab rh sebagai tokoh ulama yg berjuang membersihkan akidah umat islam yg penuh dgn kurafat. syirik dan kesesatan di bumi mekah.
Kesan pembersihan tu terbawa sampai hari ini (lihat macamana almarhum raja arab saudi di kebumikan).
Dr al-qardawi kata syeikh mohd abd wahab ni sebagai ulama pembersih akidah, ada pulak dari kita kat malaysia ni boleh kata dia (mohd abd wahab) perosak akidah ???.....siapa kita jika mahu dibandingkan dengan Prof Dr Yusuf Al-Qardawi...??..
Kesimpulannya, masih ada banyak perkara yg lebih sesat ada kat Malaysia ni yg antum patut highlight, dari cerita benda yg tak pasti sesat.
abuiazat.
Azrin Mohd W. Abdul
Sent by: [email protected] 08/30/2005 02:27 PM
|
|
Ni lah masaalah2 orang yang tidak membaca buku-buku sejarah islam sepenuhnya. Muhammad Abdul Wahab adalah pengasas ajaran wahibi iaitu orang yang telah mengambil kesempatan dari perbalahan antara ahli sufi dizamannya. Prof. Hamka, iaitu seorang ahli sufi dan ulamak juga ada menyebut cerita ringkas mengenai 'wahabi' ini dalam bukunya yang bertajuk 'tasauf moden' ingat2lah, hadis dan ajaran sufi adalah peninggalan dari Rasullullah. Pikirkan.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Akhi engsian....takkan akhi tak kenal grad it ni....dah berapa milis dia pergi nak semaikan benih anti salafi/wahabi ni tapi tak berjaya malah dia pulak yg terkena macam menepuk air di dulang....la ni dia try kat hidayahnet pulak. Sampai bilalah dia ni nak menegakkan benang yg basah.....abuya dulu kata dah taubat...grad it............
abuaizat.
=="Inactiveengsian saw74
Sent by: [email protected]
|
|
Kisah Confessions of a British Spy adalah satu cerita rekaan yang
digunakan untuk memfitnah ulama Islam, Muhammad Abdul Wahab. Tidak
diketahui siapakah penulisnya, fakta-fakta yang salah dan
mengandungi tuduhan-tuduhan tidak berasas pada Muhammad Abdul Wahab.
Amat malang bila kisah ini ditelan bulat-bulat tanpa soal selidik
oleh banyak golongan yang tidak mengetahui apa itu gerakan wahabi
dan siapakah Muhammad Abdul Wahab.
Berikut saya petik penyelidikan yang dilakukan oleh Suhayb
Hasan 'Abdul Ghaffâr terhadap kisah Confessions of British Spy.
The Hempher's Memoirs, Confessions of a British Spy.
(www.islaam.net).
.--- comment by Shaykh Suhayb Hasan 'Abdul Ghaffâr ---
This book was translated into Urdu in India and it was claimed by
its publishers that Hampher was an English spy whose duty was to spy
on the Ottoman caliphate in the 18 th Century. He went through
training in adopting an Islamic identity and learning Arabic, and
then travelled to Basra where he met Sheikh Muhammad bin Abdul
Wahhab, and a strong friendship developed between the two. The
Publishers claim that these memoirs remained hidden until they fell
into the hands of the Germans during World War II, who published it
as a way of slandering the British government. It was translated
into French, Arabic and Urdu. A perusal of this book makes it
abundantly clear that it is an imaginary fictional narrative, coined
deliberately to discredit Sheikh ibn Abdul Wahhab and his followers
by the British. Our evidence to prove the book is a concoction is
twofold: historical evidence from its contents, and our fruitless
search to find the original English version.
1. We began with a trip to the British Library's Rare Books
Section, which contains books printed prior to 1975. There were 72
entries under Hampher, but none related to our subject. We found one
entry under Hampher's Memoirs (printed 1734), but these were the
memoirs of the Duke of Gloucester who recorded his relations with
the ruling family of the time.
The publishers of the offending book had also given a number of
alternative titles such as `Colonisation Ideal' and `The English spy
in Islamic countries'. Needless to say we found no such book, and
neither did our search under `spy' reveal anything useful. The
advent of computers has made access to rare and remote books very
easy, and we have been forced to conclude after an intensive search
that no such book exists and that we have a fabricated translation
published by the enemies of the Sheikh ibn Abdul Wahhab.
2. Hampher claims he travelled to Istanbul in 1710 at the age
of 20. He returned to London and then travelled to Basrah in 1712
after a long sea journey lasting six months. This claim is
irrational as sea travel between England and Gulf was not that long.
He also claims to have met Shaikh At Taee, one of the Sheikhs of
Basrah. He then met a carpenter of Iranian origins called Abdul Riza
with whom he began working, and there he met a. young man who spoke
Turkish, Persian and Arabic. He wore the garb of students and was
known as Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab. [31] The claim of this
acquaintance is clearly false. Sheikh ibn Abdul Wahhab was born in
1703, attaining majority at the age of twelve when his father
arranged his marriage. After travelling to the Hijaz for the Hajj,
he returned to Najd and stayed with his father to study. He did not
travel to seek knowledge until 1722 when he travelled to Makkah,
Madina and Basrah. There is thus no possibility of the Sheikh and
the fictional Hampher meeting in Basrah as the dates do not
correspond. And all the scholars who have researched the biography
of the Sheikh have rejected claims that the Sheikh travelled to
Turkey and Persia. [32]
3. The book claims that the Sheikh expressed a desire to travel
to Istanbul, but was advised against it by Hampher for fear of
persecution from the Ottomans. He advised the Sheikh to travel to
Isfahan instead, and the Sheikh did so. This too is a lie. Syyed
Abdul Haleem al Jundi quotes in
`Al Imam Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab ` the victory of the Salafi
method', `I discussed this with Sheikh ibn Baz, who denied the
journey to Kurdistan and Iran. Sheikh Ibn Baz told me he took this
information from his Sheikhs, including the grandchildren of Sheikh
Ibn Abdul Wahhab, and especially his own Sheikh, Muhammad ibn
Ibrahim'. [33]
4. Hampher claims that the Sheikh declared his da'wah in 1143
AH. This is the only time he uses the hijrah calendar in his book.
It also reveals his ignorance of historical facts, as the Sheikh
returned to Huraymilah three years before the death of his father in
1153, and declared his da'wah after the death of his father.
5. There is yet more evidence that Hampher was devoid of
historical knowledge. Hampher travelled to Istanbul in 1710, giving
the ostensible reason that the British Empire was assigning great
importance to its established colonies. The Empire was so vast it
was said that the sun did not set within its boundaries. Although
the British Isles were themselves relatively small, the extended
territories including India, China and the Middle East were
extensive and required careful governance. The Ministry for Colonies
decided to recruit spies to gather information from the territories,
and so Hampher became involved. 34 It is historically inaccurate to
place these events at the beginning of the 18 th Century. India at
the time was not a colony; the East India Company began trading in
the 17 th Century but had no political hold until.
1757 when Bengal was captured. It began expanding until the rule of
the Company was transferred to direct rule from England in 1857.
Therefore, there was no Indian colony in 1710. There was also no
British colonial involvement in China at the time; Hong Kong did not
fall to the British until the Treaty of 1898.
It is therefore clear that the inventor of the Memoirs has let his
imagination run riot and abandon historical accuracy. He has set his
story at the end of the 19 th Century in the heyday of the British
Empire, when the sun truly did not set on its colonies. But in doing
so, he has exposed himself to be a writer of fiction, not fact.
6. The author attributes many actions and words to the Sheikh
which are at clear odds with the beliefs, teachings and distinctly
Islamic character of the Sheikh. There is no need to discuss these
filthy slanders in any detail, as the authenticity of the facts in
the book has been proven to be false.
7. In order to lend credibility to his `memoirs', the author
sprinkles the novel with stories of plots by the British government
to disunite the Muslims; to create ideological and religious
upheaval among them; to spread evil among their men and women; to
distance them from Arabic, the language of the Qur'an; to encourage
the use of national and social languages; to establish missionary
schools; and to weaken the position of the Muslims politically and
economically.
I have attempted to prove the fabrication of this book through its
historical inaccuracy and doubtful authorship, as I believe that no
one else has done so yet. In fact, a book as insignificant as this
does not deserve even a second glance, let alone a serious critical
study. But from a sense of duty and Amanah, I decided to shed light
on the lies contained within it. And Allah knows best the intentions.
--- End of comment by Shaykh Suhayb Hasan 'Abdul Ghaffâr ---
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/TXWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
All views expressed herein belong to the individuals concerned and do not in any way reflect the official views of Hidayahnet unless sanctioned or approved otherwise.
If your mailbox clogged with mails from Hidayahnet, you may wish to get a daily digest of emails by logging-on to http://www.yahoogroups.com to change your mail delivery settings or email the moderators at [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the title "change to daily digest".
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hidayahnet/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
All views expressed herein belong to the individuals concerned and do not in any way reflect the official views of Hidayahnet unless sanctioned or approved otherwise.
If your mailbox clogged with mails from Hidayahnet, you may wish to get a daily digest of emails by logging-on to http://www.yahoogroups.com to change your mail delivery settings or email the moderators at [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the title "change to daily digest".
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
All views expressed herein belong to the individuals concerned and do not in any way reflect the official views of Hidayahnet unless sanctioned or approved otherwise.
If your mailbox clogged with mails from Hidayahnet, you may wish to get a daily digest of emails by logging-on to http://www.yahoogroups.com to change your mail delivery settings or email the moderators at [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the title "change to daily digest".
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "hidayahnet" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
All views expressed herein belong to the individuals concerned and do not in any way reflect the official views of Hidayahnet unless sanctioned or approved otherwise.
If your mailbox clogged with mails from Hidayahnet, you may wish to get a daily digest of emails by logging-on to http://www.yahoogroups.com to change your mail delivery settings or email the moderators at [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the title "change to daily digest".
SPONSORED LINKS
| Islam and the west | Islam koran | Different religions beliefs |
| Islam | Divine inspiration |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "hidayahnet" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
