Thanks. And yes, this kind of feedback is great. --Paul
On 4/16/09 6:39 PM, "David Kuehr-McLaren" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Paul, > > Thanks. > > You have probably already corrected this one, as well, in 1.1.106 the label > for "partof" is "part". > > David > > PS. I should ask you if you want these types of comments? > > David Kuehr-McLaren > Tivoli Security > 919.224.1960 > > > > Paul Trevithick <[email protected]> 04/16/2009 05:46 PM > To > David Kuehr-McLaren/Raleigh/i...@ibmus > cc > higgins-dev <[email protected]> > Subject > Re: [higgins-dev] Intent of Policy in Higgins 1.1 > > > > > David, > > That was a bug. I¹ve fixed it in (upcoming) 1.1.107. The RDF Label now reads > ³Policy². The Policy class is the superclass of the ³AccessControl² class. > > --Paul > > > On 4/16/09 9:46 AM, "David Kuehr-McLaren" <[email protected] > <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Paul, > > The RDF Label on the Policy object in the HOWL1-1-106.rdf file says the Policy > object is an Access Control Policy. Is that true (there is a subclass for > access control), or is the Policy object a base object that can apply as the > parent class to other policy types? > > Thanks, > > David > > David Kuehr-McLaren > Tivoli Security > 919.224.1960 > >
_______________________________________________ higgins-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
