Hi Paul,

I think you forgot to include a link in your reply.
I assume you meant this: http://wiki.eclipse.org/Higgins/ModelAPIs
The idea there was to say Models are Entities themselves instead of
specialized interfaces.

Markus

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Paul Trevithick <[email protected]>wrote:

>  Berend,
>
> We would like to replace the Model interfaces in IdAS entirely for Higgins
> 1.1 (see [1]). We’re looking for volunteers :)
>
> --Paul
>
>
> On 7/9/09 5:23 AM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Markus,
>
> thank you for your advice. As you guessed I am thinking about the case 3 in
> your list, the concrete domain ontology or the schema of the CP. I was
> confused that there is no "automatic" mapping, when I create a context in
> Higgins via the Higgins registry, because I saw all the "Model" classes in
> the Higgins Java code. I will take a look at the special Jena CP for the
> OWL/RDF handling.
>
> - Thanks
> Berend
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *Von:* [email protected]  [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>]
> *Im Auftrag von *Markus  Sabadello
> *Gesendet:* Montag, 6. Juli 2009 20:15
> *An:* Higgins  (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions
> *Betreff:* Re:  [higgins-dev] Newbie question: Higgins Ontology (HOWL XML
> File) to Java Model  Classes (EntityModel,AttributeModel) Mapping. How does
> it  work?
>
>
> Hello Berend,
>
> I am not sure exactly what you mean with  "Higgins ontology XML file".
> There are three things to be distinguished  here:
>
> 1. The cdm.owl file in the org.eclipse.higgins.ontology  project.
> This is what we call the Higgins "Context Data Model". You can  read about
> it here:
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Context_Data_Model
> It  defines the very basic foundations (Contexts, Entities, Attributes) of
> our  data model. The cdm.owl file is meant only for documenting purposes. It
> is  basically an RDF/OWL file describing the same concepts as the above wiki
> page,  but this file is never used programmatically.
>
> 2. The higgins.owl file  in the org.eclipse.higgins.ontology project.
> This file is based on the  above "Context Data Model". This is an "upper
> ontology" which is meant to  serve as a basis for concrete domain ontologies
> (see next point). It describes  some more advanced features which we
> actually use programmatically in IdAS.  For example, it describes an access
> control mechanism, and how to make  statements about attributes (e.g.
> lastModified, creator, ...)
>
> 3. A  concrete domain ontology (aka as the schema of a Context Provider).
> Maybe  this is what you referring to. This defines the concrete classes of
> Entities  and Attributes in a Context Provider, like employee, supplier,
> e-mail address,  friend, etc. IdAS itself doesn't define these things, it's
> up to the  individual Context Providers to do this (well, you probably know
> this  already). Anyway, the point is that therefore Context Providers also
> have  their own code for implementing the IdAS Model API and returning
> "models" for  their Entities and Attributes. Some CPs can be very restricted
> (e.g. allowing  only a few predefined Entity and Attribute classes), whereas
> others can be  very open (allowing pretty much anything).
>
> If you create your own  Context Provider, I would say that it is good
> practice - but not required - to  write down its domain ontology in an
> RDF/OWL file, potentially using some  parts of higgins.owl.
>
> Maybe you have already created such a domain  ontology, and now you want to
> automatically create Model classes based on it.  Is this what you are
> asking?
>
> Conceptually I guess this would make  sense. I don't think we have code for
> automatically "converting" a domain  ontology (expressed in RDF/OWL) to a
> set of Java classes that can be used for  the IdAS Model API. BUT: We have
> one Context Provider (the Jena one) which  internally stores its data as
> RDF. It properly supports the IdAS Model API.  This means that the code in
> the Jena Context Provider could come very close to  what you are looking
> for. For example, if you call getAttributeModels() on an  Entity from the
> Jena CP, it will take a look at its own ontology and return  IdAS Model
> objects for the RDF Properties it finds.
>
> If this sounds  promising, have a look at the Java package
> org.eclipse.higgins.idas.model.impl  in the org.eclipse.higgins.cp.jena2
> project.
>
> Hope that helps a bit, let  us know if you still have questions..
>
> Markus
>
> P.S. The only  reason why the XMLFile Context Provider doesn't support the
> IdAS Model API is  that nobody has written it; conceptually it could support
> it.
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 5:02 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Dear  Higgins Team,
>
> we are currently looking into the Higgins project as a  base implementation
> for an IdAS/Context Provider solution for our user  profiles distributed
> over different application silos.
>
> One key point  we are still having problems with, is the question how to
> map the Higgins  Ontology (as defined in an XML file) to the actual "Model"
> classes in the  java code (EntityModel, AttributeModel) that can be accessed
> via the  "getModel()" method.
>
> For example, the Higgins 1.0 solution for the  XMLFile Context Provider
> does not implement such a mapping. The "getModel"  method is just not
> implemented here.
>
> Also I can find no source code  that may do such a "generic" scanning and
> conversion of the Higgins ontology  XML file. From my partial understanding
> of Higgins so far, I would think  that this mapping task is similar for each
> context, because the Higgins  ontology is specified. So I do not have to
> implement such a mapping for each  context provider, but can reuse some
> conversion method implemented in the  Higgins framework.
>
> Is that so? And if yes, where is it done? What  code can I reuse, when I
> write my own context provider?
>
> Any help to  get me on the right direction will be appreciated.
>
>
> Kind  regards,
> Berend Boll
> T-Systems Enterprise Services GmbH
> Systems  Integration
> Project Delivery Unit Telco
> IP Products Service &  Network
> Berend Boll
> IT Systems Architect
> Goslarer Ufer 35, 10589  Berlin
> +49 30 3497-3246 (Tel.)
> +49 30 3497-3247 (Fax)
> +49 170  7641785 (Mobil)
> E-Mail: [email protected]
> Internet: http://www.t-systems.com
>
> T-Systems Enterprise  Services GmbH
> Aufsichtsrat: René Obermann  (Vorsitzender)
> Geschäftsführung: Reinhard Clemens (Vorsitzender), Dr.  Ferri Abolhassan,
> Olaf Heyden, Joachim Langmack, Dr. Matthias Schuster,  Klaus Werner
> Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main HRB  55933
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main
> WEEE-Reg.-Nr.  DE87523644
>
>
> Notice: This transmittal and/or attachments may be  privileged or
> confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are  hereby
> notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any  review,
> dissemination, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you received  this
> transmittal in error, please notify us immediately by reply and  immediately
> delete this message and all its attachments. Thank  you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> higgins-dev  mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> higgins-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev

Reply via email to