These single component solutions are a corner case...I guess I¹d put stuff that¹s of interest to consumers of the solution on the solution level pages. And I¹d put any ³internal² implementation details, on the component level. But it probably doesn¹t matter much. What¹s important is that both levels of wiki page exist and reference each other.
--Paul On 8/26/09 5:03 PM, "Markus Sabadello" <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes that looks right, but I still have a hard time understanding if I should > document these things at the solution-level page: > http://wiki.eclipse.org/Attribute_Service_1.1#Architecture > http://wiki.eclipse.org/IdAS_Proxy_Service_1.1 > > or at the component-level page. E.g. I've done some work here: > http://wiki.eclipse.org/Org.eclipse.higgins.as > http://wiki.eclipse.org/Org.eclipse.higgins.idas.proxy > > ? > > Markus > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Paul Trevithick <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Markus, >> >> Can you please review: >> * http://wiki.eclipse.org/Attribute_Service_1.1#Architecture >> * http://wiki.eclipse.org/IdAS_Proxy_Service_1.1 >> >> And tell me how to fix/improve. >> >> --Paul > >
_______________________________________________ higgins-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
