> > Isn't d:score basically treated as if it's a property? In > that case, this should work:
I thought Amon described already that it did not work :-) > This means: sort first by score, then (when score is equal) by title. > I haven't tested this, but this is how I think it should work. > Didn't you read my posts that it was possible to implement, but not yet available? The d:score when present in a d:order should be translated into a Sort.RELEVANCE lucene sort. Though, if I implement it, I will ignore the ascending descending, because it will obviously always be descending and I think (though not sure) that ascending would imply slow searches (and don't make any sense) Ard > ******************************************** Hippocms-dev: Hippo CMS development public mailinglist
