> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Ari Keranen > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 5:15 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Fwd: Status of WG items > > Or we can do this. > > However, I would not be too concerned for the CERT draft blocking the > reg draft given that the CERT draft should not require much (any?) > changes for STD track. Of course that would need someone driving that > work too. > > If there's not enough interest for that work (I think it's important > but don't have the cycles to do it myself), it makes sense to go > forward as proposed below.
I agree with the above. I would support carrying them forward as is and trying to publish together, but if the authors prefer to decouple, I would be fine with that approach. - Tom _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
