Hi,
we discussed with Julien that we should update DNS extensions at least
for ECC. Should we also include also OGA bits in DNS?
What else?
On 12/11/2013 06:38 AM, [email protected] wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of the
IETF.
Title : Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Domain Name System (DNS)
Extension
Author(s) : Julien Laganier
Filename : draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-03.txt
Pages : 16
Date : 2013-12-10
Abstract:
This document specifies a new resource record (RR) for the Domain
Name System (DNS), and how to use it with the Host Identity Protocol
(HIP). This RR allows a HIP node to store in the DNS its Host
Identity (HI, the public component of the node public-private key
pair), Host Identity Tag (HIT, a truncated hash of its public key),
and the Domain Names of its rendezvous servers (RVSs). This document
obsoletes RFC5205.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis
There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-03
A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-03
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
