On Jun 23, 2014, at 12:18 PM, Julien Laganier <[email protected]> wrote:
> Do we really need an update of the draft for the sake of "s/is to be/was/"?

Well, see Barry's DISCUSS... :)

The other way to address comments like this is in an RFC Editor note, but if 
you update the draft, then you don't have to worry about the information 
accidentally being lost.

_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec

Reply via email to