Hi,

On 07/29/2014 01:14 AM, Tom Henderson wrote:
This issue with RFC5201-bis is being tracked as issue 48:
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/hip/trac/ticket/48

When a HIP association is in state CLOSING and new data arrives to send
to the peer, Table 7 states to send another I1 but stay in CLOSING,
while our state machine diagram implies that there is a transition to
state I1-SENT.

I propose to fix this by changing the Table 7 to read that the state
machine transitions to state I1-SENT in this case.

Any comments or objections?

seems ok to me.

_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec

Reply via email to