Hi Tom,
On 12/16/2014 05:31 PM, Tom Henderson wrote:
I noticed that the draft for RFC5204-bis (rendezvous extension) was
recently refreshed, and was wondering what the remaining open issues are
for this draft?
I know of only one, which is a longstanding question of whether we want
to cover RVS relaying of UPDATE messages in this specification.
https://tools.ietf.org/wg/hip/trac/ticket/1
Some choices appear to be:
* do not support double jump in these specifications, leaving it for
further study
* add specification in RFC5204-bis that refers to UPDATE relaying
* add specification in RFC5206-bis that refers to UPDATE relaying
I suggest the third option (unless Julien wants to write it in RFC5204).
Besides UPDATE relaying, we need also some text for the other side,
i.e., the registered host moves and updates its registration.
_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
