Authors, could you please address Tom's comments below and revise the draft accordingly?
Thanks, Gonzalo On 23/07/2015 1:19 AM, Tom Henderson wrote: > > > On 07/03/2015 01:08 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:> Folks, >> >> I would like to start a WGLC on the following draft. This WGLC will end >> on July 26th (i.e., right after the IETF meeting): >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/ >> >> Please, send your comments to this list. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Gonzalo >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Hipsec mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec >> > > Below are my (minor) comments on this draft. It is mostly unchanged from > RFC6253, and I am fine with proceeding once the nits are fixed. > > - references to RFC4843 should be replaced by references to RFC7343 > > - IANA considerations section should be redone; since you are not introducing > any new parameters, you should just ask IANA to replace references to RFC6253 > (for the CERT parameter, Certificate Types, and Notify Message Types) with > references to this specification. > > - in Section 3, replace > IP Address:2001:2C:5a14:26de:a07c:385b:de35:60e3 > with > IP Address:2001:2c:5a14:26de:a07c:385b:de35:60e3 > > > Tom > > > > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec > _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
