Hi, On 05/16/2016 06:50 PM, René Hummen wrote:
Hi Miika, all,thanks for reviewing the draft!
my pleasure. I am ok with your changes, just a small note below.
> 2.1. Requirements Terminology
In section 6.3, you are introduce also -> notation, which was
not explained.
I didn't think an explanation of this formal notation was necessary as
it is also not further described, e.g., in RFC5869. What would you like
me to write here?
I should probably read RFC5869 before I can understand how to implement the key derivation for DEX. It was a bit difficult to follow what is the input and especially what is the resulting output.
The reference for RFC5869 is missing?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
