Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-13: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I have a couple of minor nearly DISCUSSes that should be easy to fix: This document doesn't have "Changes since RFC XXXX" section as required for any -bis document. Can you please convert Appendix A to be such a section? As this is a -bis document that obsoletes the original RFC 5206, its IANA Considerations section should be self contained. I think you should mention that IANA has allocated type 193 for LOCATOR_SET and type 46 for LOCATOR_TYPE_UNSUPPORTED Notify Message Type, as specified in RFC 5206. _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list Hipsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
