Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-13: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- My review was based on the diff vs. 5206 [1], and turned up nothing new of note:-) Seems like a reasonable update to me. I do however agree about the privacy issue raised by Mirja wrt exposing locators. It is worth noting that, so that implementers have it flagged that they need to consider that - not doing so caused quite a fuss for WebRTC so better to not repeat that. [1] https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=rfc5206&url2=draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-13.txt _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list Hipsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
