Thank you for the review Magnus! See below answer to your first question (the 
others need a bit more time to answer).

> On 5. Mar 2020, at 13.08, Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-30: Discuss
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> So I think the below are important things that needs to be discussed before
> proceeding. However, I might have missed things as I didn't have time to read
> the whole document in detail. Several of the issues are pieces for discussion
> to ensure that the right thing really is done.
> 
> 1. So this document recommends the usage of port 10500 as default listening
> port. A port registered by Ari and also used for RFC 5770. I get the 
> impression
> that the port was registered separately from RFC 5770. So the port is assigned
> to Ari. Would Ari be willing to release the port for re-assignment to IESG
> control. RFC 6335 has the recommendation for ports for IETF protocols that the
> assignee is IESG and the contact [email protected]. This to have the change
> control with IETF as body rather than with individuals.
> 
> If Ari agrees to this, I think it would be good to have the IANA section be
> updated to note the re-assignment and provide the necessary information.

I don't quite remember the history for this port registration anymore, but yes, 
IESG control for this sounds good to me.
 

Cheers,
Ari

_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec

Reply via email to