Hi Adam, ma, 2020-02-24 kello 09:15 -0800, Adam Roach via Datatracker kirjoitti: > Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-30: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut > this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal/ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > COMMENT: > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > > Thanks to the authors for taking some of the concerns I laid out in > my original > ballot into account. I still do not believe this approach is good for > HIP's > benefit, but am no longer worried about collateral damage from other > protocols > imitating this approach. Accordingly, I am balloting "No Objection." > > There is one remaining comment from my initial review that I think > can and > should be addressed prior to publication: > > Appendix B: > > > o Unlike in ICE, the addresses are not XOR-ed in Native ICE-HIP > > protocol in order to avoid middlebox tampering. > > This bullet should explain why such obfuscation is unnecessary.
based on discussion with Rescolarla, it actually says: "Unlike in ICE, the addresses are not XOR-ed in Native ICE-HIP protocol but rather encrypted to avoid middlebox tampering." https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-30#appendix-B P.S. Thanks again for your time and effort in reviewing the document! _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list Hipsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
