Hi Magnus, ti, 2020-07-28 kello 07:44 -0700, Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker kirjoitti: > Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-32: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut > this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal/ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > COMMENT: > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > > Thanks for resolving and answering my questions. > > I have only one minor comment that I noticed due to that you edit the > text: > > Section 2: > "Following [RFC5770] and SDP [RFC3264] ..." > > RFC 3264 is not SDP, it is the "Offer/Answer model with SDP" there is > a > significant difference, as SDP base spec is RFC4566.
how about: SDP related naming conventions [RFC3264] or just: [RFC3264] _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
