Thank you Miika for these pieces of information.
Gonzalo, as you are the document shepherd for DEX, would you mind updating the
write-up with this list of implementations?
For information, I have just request the IESG secretary to approve the HIP-NAT
document as all DISCUSS & COMMENT points were addressed. Now, we need to get
DEX through
-éric
-----Original Message-----
From: Miika Komu <miika.k...@ericsson.com>
Date: Tuesday, 4 August 2020 at 14:50
To: Eric Vyncke <evyn...@cisco.com>, "hipsec@ietf.org" <hipsec@ietf.org>
Cc: Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camari...@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: Status of HIP-DEX/BEX implementations
Hi Eric,
ti, 2020-07-14 kello 11:45 +0000, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) kirjoitti:
> [Bcc previous and current authors in HIP related documents]
>
> In the framework of the IESG evaluation of HIP-DEX, it would be
> useful to know whether there are implementations of HIP-DEX.
sorry for not sending this earlier due to my vacations. I am aware of
three implementations (no idea about interoperability):
1. Contiki-based implementation
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259475424_Slimfit_-_A_HIP_DEX_compression_layer_for_the_IP-based_Internet_of_Things
2. Java: https://code.google.com/archive/p/hip-dex/
3. Java: https://github.com/juhovh/hip-dex/tree/master/SpotHIP
> In the same vein, getting a list of HIPv2 BEX (Base Exchange) would
> also be useful.
AFAIK, HIPv2 has been implemented and interoperated successfully by the
following implementations:
1. OpenHIP
2. HIP for Linux
(Maybe also by the HIP4Inter.net implementation but I am not sure about
this)
_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
Hipsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
