It is a high quality work horse. I've worked with newer and older microtomes of this very model and never had any problems. You can utilize the motorized function to minimize repetitive motion, but you can also use it manually if needed. What is there not to like?
Beatrice DeBrosse-Serra HT(ASCP)QIHC Isis Pharmaceuticals Antisense Drug Discovery 2855 Gazelle Ct. Carlsbad, CA 92010 760-603-2371 -----Original Message----- From: Ian R Bernard [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 3:53 AM To: Bea DeBrosse-Serra; Fred Underwood; Histonet Subject: RE: [Histonet] Microtome feedback What is great about the Leica RM2255? -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bea DeBrosse-Serra Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 8:58 PM To: Fred Underwood; Histonet Subject: RE: [Histonet] Microtome feedback Fred, The Leica RM2255 all the way! Go Dayton! Bea ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Fred Underwood [[email protected]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 12:48 PM To: Histonet Subject: [Histonet] Microtome feedback Hello and TGIF to everyone. I'm exploring getting a new microtome and would like to draw on the vast knowledge and experience out there in Histoland. The three I'm looking at are: the Zeiss Hyrax M55, Thermo Scientific ME+, and the Leica RM2255. Thanks, Fred Underwood Montgomery County Coroner's Office Dayton, OH _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list [email protected] http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list [email protected] http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
