Thanks for the responses to my question re IHC wash without buffer.  It made me 
examine the question more thoroughly with empirical comparisons.

The Dako IHC manual is a good reference.  But, the take home message I got 
after reviewing it didn't alter my view that buffer wash may not be required.  
Following the initial electrostatic interaction that occurs between antibody 
and antigen in the milieu of the antibody diluent, the Ab-Ag bond is maintained 
via Van der Waals and hydrophobic forces.  No matter what the slide is rinsed 
with, I don't think this microenvironment is going to be altered.

In our hands, IHC results with twenty antibodies has not been adversly effected 
by using dH2O in place of wash buffer (TBST in our case) - staining intensity 
and contrast with the water wash is equivalent to buffer washed slides.

I located a reference that supports the use of a water wash (Hallelujah - I'm 
not crazy) in:

      TECHNICAL IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY:Achieving Reliability and Reproducibility 
of Immunostains.

      Rodney T. Miller, M.D.
      Director of Immunohistochemistry
      ProPath Laboratory, Inc.
      8267 Elmbrook, Suite 100, Dallas, Texas 75247-4009
      Phone (214) 237-1631 FAX (214) 237-1770
      www.propathlab.com E mail: 
rmil...@propathlab.com<mailto:rmil...@propathlab.com>

            An excerpt from the reference states:

            Although previously I never thought of using anything else for 
rinsing steps, a conversation with another immunohistochemist (Dave Tacha, 
BioCare, Walnut Creek, CA) led me to try distilled water with Tween 20 
(DW/Tween20) rather than PBS for the rinsing steps.  When we evaluated the 
performance of DW/Tween 20 for our rinsing solution between steps, it performed 
just as well as using PBS with Tween 20, so we now routinely use DW with 0.2% 
Tween 20 (2 ml Tween 20 in 10 liters of DW) for all of our rinses that 
previously used buffer.  This has saved us substantial amounts of reagent cost 
as well as reagent preparation time, since preparing DW/Tween 20 is far easier 
and cheaper than preparing our previous PBS buffer rinsing solutions.

OK, detergent is still present, but with polymner-based IHC, background has not 
been a problem . . . . .yet.
At the very lease, the cost of Tween 20 and distilled water is a whole lot 
cheaper than Tween 20 and buffer.

Happy validating!

Tresa




Tresa Goins
Histopathology Section
Montana Veterinary Diagnostic Lab
Bozeman, MT 59715
406-994-6353

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

Reply via email to