Hi

I am a member of the Society for One-Place Studies, “where family history and 
local history unite”. I have been exploring how we might support people doing 
One-Place Studies (OPS) to use mapping. To this end I have developed a forum 
(mapping4ops.org) where ideas, experiences, documentation etc can be be logged, 
and a prototype mapping system M4OPS (Mapping for One-Place Studies - 
mapping4ops.org/M4OPS) . On M4OPS we have a number of studies, each with both 
current and historic maps that we can layer over each, together with features 
from data that our researches uncover. Technically M4OPS use OpenLayers4, and 
we are able to cope with inputs from lots of different sources, and in 
different formats, as well as create our own. 



Knowing we have similar but different aims, when I started out I did try 
reaching out to the OHM mailing list, and had a few responses. I have not seen 
many posts on the OHM mailing list until recently, so I was not sure how active 
the group are.



While I am always happy to talk generally about mapping and local history, in 
the current discussion I thought I would mention what I have tried out for time 
sliders in case it is of interest. You can see an example in the last section 
of my demo system (click on Next for more explanation).



Because I come from the genealogical world I personally use GEDCOM* style dates 
(1924, MAR 1876, BEF, AFT, FROM, ABT etc) in my databases (eg for people, 
events, buildings, relationships). Although not perfect, and initially hard to 
program for, these do give all the flexibility I need. A few of us on the forum 
have discussed some of the issues (eg here), but I cannot pretend to have 
solved them yet. I have not yet enabled our time slider to cope with all the 
flexibility of GEDCOM dates.



Peter Cooper



* For anyone not familiar with GEDCOM the current version (v5.5) is from the 
1990's, is far from perfect, and is very widely used. For various reasons (eg 
RootsWeb being unavailable) the specification is a bit difficult to work with 
at present. One description is here, and the (very comprehensive) GEDCOM X 
proposal is here..





From: PauLL170 
Sent: Sunday, May 6, 2018 11:19 AM
To: Jeff Meyer 
Cc: [email protected] ; Jonathan Masur 
Subject: Re: [OHM] Open Historical map

Hi,


i'm already mapping Germersheim and a bit of Trier :) . Regarding start_date 
and end_date I was talking about the following: E. g. if you have a photo from 
1983-05-01 with a certain building and one from 1980-07-01 without it, you can 
set as start_date 1980-07-01..1983-05-01. In my opinion it is important that 
the time slider recognizes this form, because it is often the case. Generally, 
we will have to think about how to render this object in this period, in which 
the building possibly already have existed. But for now, I just want to suggest 
that the time slider recognizes this form in general, as far as it is doable. 
As a first version I imagine a check box: "show doubtful objects". If it is 
activiated, the "start_date" technically is set 1980-07-01 and if not, it is 
set 1983-05-01.


Best regards
Paul



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Historic mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic
_______________________________________________
Historic mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic

Reply via email to