[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12757715#action_12757715
]
Joydeep Sen Sarma commented on HIVE-224:
----------------------------------------
no - i guess we didn't - although it's an easy one.. fallout of reading the
SOSP paper?
ridiculous - they are reporting 'accumator partial-hash' as something new
(never reported in literature) when reference #1 in their paper implements
exactly that. so much for research.
> implement lfu based flushing policy for map side aggregates
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-224
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-224
> Project: Hadoop Hive
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Joydeep Sen Sarma
>
> currently we flush some random set of rows when the map side hash table
> approaches memory limits.
> we have discussed a strategy of flushing hash table entries that have the
> been seen the least number of times (effectively LFU flushing strategy). This
> will be very effective at reducing the amount of data sent from map to reduce
> step - as well as reduce the chances for any skews.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.