^A is not printable. That will create confusion to users looking at the log
right?

Zheng

On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Josh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'm gonna throw my vote in for a structured log format. Users could tail it
> and use whatever queuing or monitoring they wish. It's also probably just a
> 30 minute project for someone already familiar with the code. I suggest ^A
> seperated key=value pairs per log line.8
>
> Josh Ferguson
>
> On Dec 8, 2008, at 1:09 PM, Ashish Thusoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Perhaps we should just have another log4j channel for this instead of
> debug. The consumers can then just listen on this channel and take
> appropriate action.
>
> Another option would be to implement this using a message queue
> (publish/subscribe system). We could leverage ActiveMQ or something similar,
> but that would be a bit more heavyweight but potentially people can develop
> or advanced monitoring applications around it.
>
> Ashish
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Joydeep Sen Sarma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>
> *Sent:* Monday, December 08, 2008 12:17 PM
> *To:* <hive-user@hadoop.apache.org>hive-user@hadoop.apache.org
> *Subject:* RE: Hadoop JobStatus
>
>  The jobid is printed out for non-silent session execution mode.
>
>
>
> Since there's no structured interface – I had tried to have structured data
> emitted as key=value in the output stream. The relevant output emitted here
> is from:
>
>
>
>       console.printInfo("Starting Job = " + rj.getJobID() + ", Tracking URL
> = " + rj.getTrackingURL());
>
>
>
> would really welcome a discussion on a better way to get structured data
> out from the output.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Josh Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> *Sent:* Monday, December 08, 2008 12:08 PM
> *To:* <hive-user@hadoop.apache.org>hive-user@hadoop.apache.org
> *Subject:* Hadoop JobStatus
>
>
>
> When launching off hive queries using hive -e is there a way to get the job
> id so that I can just queue them up and go check their statuses later?
> What's the general pattern for queueing and monitoring without using the
> libraries directly?
>
>
>
> Josh Ferguson
>
>


-- 
Yours,
Zheng

Reply via email to