Date: 2004-05-04T19:54:20
   Editor: 216.138.221.115 <>
   Wiki: Jakarta HiveMind Wiki
   Page: NotXMLProposal
   URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-hivemind/NotXMLProposal

   no comment

Change Log:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -307,3 +307,6 @@
 HarishKrishnaswamy: Couple things I forgot to mention: Producing HiveDoc is 
just as simple because the comments could be a part of the AST and we could 
annotate them for HiveDoc. And secondly, with this approach I don't think we 
need a special tool like Spindle for the descriptors; the eclipse scrapbook 
page is good enough, IMO.
 
 I certainly like the SDL far better than XML for reasons I have already 
mentioned, but my point of using scripting language was to save us the trouble 
of creating another language and make it more easily adoptable. If I were new 
to HiveMind, I wouldn't want to worry about the schema and factory and friends. 
I would simply want to say here's my service point and here's the 
implementation, you do your thing and get me the service. Or here's the 
configuration point and here's all the contributions. Don't get me wrong, I 
still like all the concepts in HiveMind, its just the usage ;) And just to make 
it clear, there are no flames here!
+
+ColinSampaleanu: I don't know if you're looking for outside opinions, but I 
hate the idea of inventing a new format like SDL. I agree it's a a bit cleaner 
and easier to type than XML, but ultimately it doesn't seem to me the gain is 
that great that it makes up for the fact that it's completely proprietary and 
nobody is able to leverage the work of anybody else (i.e. other tools able to 
read the same format). For this reason, YAML or even a scrpting solution like 
Groovy or BeanShell are preferable to me, along with XML which should remain a 
standby.
+

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to