Date: 2004-06-22T17:18:52
   Editor: 168.226.254.131 <>
   Wiki: Jakarta HiveMind Wiki
   Page: FrequentlyAskedQuestions
   URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-hivemind/FrequentlyAskedQuestions

   no comment

Change Log:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -66,6 +66,6 @@
 
 DanielFeist: Yes that's a good workable solution the only downside it has is 
that its not 100% IOC i.e. the !DataSource itself cannot be injected but rather 
work has to be done in the services constructor or init method to obtian the 
datasource.  In !HiveMinds current state that is the best solution rather than 
over complicating the BuilderFactory I suppose.
 
-I do believe though that the ability to be able to inject other entities (that 
are not services, configurations or resources) obtained from another 
lookup/factory service is an important functionality that should certainly be 
considered in future versions.  This is because not everthing can or should de 
represented as a service (e.g. if it does not implement an interface), and 
although !HiveMind ''Resource's'' are good at what they do they are limited to 
file-based resources and introduce a dependency on !HiveMind in an up to this 
point POJO service that is not dependent on !HiveMind.
+I do believe though that the ability to be able to inject other entities (that 
are not services, configurations or resources) obtained from another 
lookup/factory service is an important functionality that should certainly be 
considered in future versions.  This is because not everthing can or should de 
represented as a service (e.g. if it does not implement an interface), and 
although !HiveMind ''Resource's'' are good at what they do they are limited to 
file-based resources and introduce a dependency on !HiveMind in an up to this 
point POJO service that is not dependent on !HiveMind which would reduce 
service portability.
 
-DanielFeist:  I've just been looking at the BeanTranslator which obtains a 
bean from the BeanFactory using a locator.  This would allow us to obtain and 
inject services with beans (assuming the BuilderFactory allows a {{{set-bean}}} 
nested element).  Why can't we just extend this idea slightly making it more 
generic so that we can obtain and inject an object from a specified factory 
using the same idea of a single argument  locator?  We would then be able to 
obtain objects from a factory simply, anywhere in !HiveMind, be it in 
configurations or in the BuilderFactory schema to allow us to inject 
non-service objects.
+DanielFeist:  I've just been looking at the BeanTranslator which obtains an 
object from a BeanFactory using a locator.  This would allow the injection of 
services with beans obtained from the BeanFactory by the simple addition of a 
{{{set-bean}}} nested element to the BuilderFactory schema.  Why can't we 
extend the BeanTranslator idea, so as to be able to obtain an object from any 
factory and not just the BeanFactory, using the same idea of a single argument 
locator?  In this way it would be very easy to obtain objects from any factory 
very simply, anywhere in !HiveMind, be it in configurations or in a 
BuilderFactory nested element.  This is no more complex than what is already 
implemented in  !HiveMind and gives another level of flexibility to what you 
can do with !HiveMind.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to