Maybe I didn't word my question very well, but I think we are both talking about the same thing. That's what I was trying to find out. I think what you're suggesting is that we have a way of defining a reusable list of interceptors that can be applied to multiple services as a whole, rather than having to re-define the entire list for all the services. Is that what you want?
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 11:51 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: service for interceptor configuration James, > > Are you merely trying to set up a group of reusable > interceptors to add to a > bunch of different services? > I remember a discussion a few months ago ([1]) about being able to declare a *set of interceptors*, which could then be contributed as a whole (order as declared in descriptor) to a single service. What I described would go in the other direction by letting the developer declare *sets of services* which a single interceptor should be applied to. I didn't quite understand your question, so maybe this answer doesn't make any sense to you :-) --knut [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel/41965 P.S. Does anyone know how to get Outlook 2002 to include "References" or "In-Reply-To" headers? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
