I'm strongly in favour of discarding SDL. We already converted SDL files in
our project to XML because of the better tool support for XML.
And I think it's a pity if you spend your valuable time on writing SDL
parsers, documenting SDL syntax, fixing bugs related to it, and so on and so
forth.
Also, I don't feel SDL is much leaner than the XML equivalent.
So, please use your great capabilities to advance Hivemind in more important
areas!

Matthias Burbach: +1 (binding)


-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Harish Krishnaswamy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Gesendet: Montag, 2. August 2004 17:24
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Discard SDL?


SDL is simpler in context to XML. Although, I am still in favor of a 
scripting language; I have done my experimentation and I am convinced a 
scripting language is a much better fit considering configurations. 
Between SDL and XML, I don't see much of a difference as such, but when 
considering tool support, XML would probably win.

Harish Krishnaswamy: +0 (binding)


Howard Lewis Ship wrote:

>All this divisive talk about SDL vs. XML (vs. ???) is getting to be a 
>distraction from what HiveMind is all about. I think people are very 
>correct with the idea that the important thing is to minimize the
>*amount* of content in the XML, regardless of the expression of that 
>content. That's where we should be concentrating ... and I have a few 
>ideas along that line.
>
>Anyway, a +1 vote indicates that you feel SDL should be stripped out of 
>HiveMind (as a failed experment).  I'm cool with that, as long as 
>people piitch in to convert the many SDL into XML.
>
>Howard Lewis Ship: -0 (binding)
>
>  
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to