I think it sounds okay. In my mind (pardon the pun), HiveMind (which is not an application in and of itself) is exposing services via the Registry, TO the application.
-----Original Message----- From: Knut Wannheden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 10:50 AM To: [email protected]; Howard Lewis Ship Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release HiveMind 1.0 (final) Knut Wannheden: +1 (binding) Question about release notice... On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:21:32 -0400, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Each service (represented as a yellow circle) is an interface combined > with a Plain Old Java Object (POJO) implementation of that interface. > These services are containers of business logic, in much the way that > stateless session beans are used in a typical J2EE application. In > many cases, > the few services exposed to the application are facades around larger > networks of services. Should this read "exposed _by_ the application"? It isn't quite clear to me who is exposing the services here. --knut --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
