Just a thought for discussion. I'm looking at Knut's code for converting configurations to maps. One thing that nags me is that it uses the raw attribute value as the key.
Not sure that is best; I think the translated value for that attribute is the right thing. Only example that jumps to mind is if the translator is qualfiied id. In that case, the attribute value may be "foo" but the qualified id will be "mymodule.foo" ... that's what will be assigned to an object property, and it makes sense that the Map be keyed on "mymodule.foo" not just "foo". -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator, Jakarta Tapestry Creator, Jakarta HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
