I'd say go for LifecycleModel ... Has a better ring to it ;)
Johan
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:58:49 -0500, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you like ServiceLifecycleModel or LifecycleModel?
-----Original Message----- From: Howard Lewis Ship [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 5:15 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Rename ServiceModel to ServiceLifecycleModel...
Go for it! My weakness is naming things, and this is hidden under the covers enough that changes are not a problem.
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:57:52 -0500, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:"service
All,
While writing my article, I was having a difficult time describingmodels" in HiveMind. To me, they're more logically described as "service
lifecycle models" or more succinctly "lifecycle models." Should we change
the documentation/code to reflect such a distinction? For these core
concept changes, it'd be better to make the changes earlier rather than
later. I think it would make the framework easier to understand. Any
thoughts?
James
-- you too?
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
