It would be nice if there was some meta data some where so that the factory service could automatically adapt and retrieve the EJB instance the correct way. Also, it would be nice if the service would allow access to a stateful bean, as well as a stateless bean.
On 1/18/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > EJBProxyFactory currently doesn't support EJB3 if you're using the > "simplified" API, since you don't use "home" objects. The bean itself is > retrieved via a JNDI lookup. To support EJB3, we can either change > EJBProxyFactory or create a new SimplifiedEJBProxyFactory. What do you guys > want to do? If we modify the current code, we could assume the simplified > API if the home interface is omitted maybe. We could also not require the > JNDI name anymore, since it defaults to the name of the remote interface. > > James > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator, Jakarta Tapestry Creator, Jakarta HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
