Richard, Could you please distribute your reflection/proxy - based interceptor? (Or at least send me a version?)
Cheers, ~dmr On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 17:11:30 -0400, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wouldn't go so far as to say that there is a performance PROBLEM with > using JDK proxies. However, Javassist does provide a slight performance > gain, but I'm not convinced that it's worth the headache. I use JDK proxies > and it works just fine for all I need. If you ever do see that performance > becomes an issue, then re-implement your interceptor using something like > Javassist (or CGLIB). > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hensley, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 12:49 PM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: Reflection vs. Javassist > > I've built an interceptor that uses reflection based on the example logging > interceptor. At this point, I have no strong desire to learn Javassist > unless there are known performance problems using reflection vs using > Javaassist to build out the method implementations. > > My real question, is there any real performance to be gained by using > Javassist over Java reflection? If there is not, I don't see a good reason > to put in all the extra engineering effort. > > Richard > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
