Konstantin, On 5/23/05, Konstantin Ignatyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some time ago I compared interceptors performance, HM > is not bad: > http://kgionline.com/articles/aop_1/aop_perf.jsp
That's an interesting comparison. However, I think that it should be noted that the HiveMind service interceptor framework is really agnostic about the actual implementation mechanisms used by the interceptors. In your example the overhead imposed by HiveMind's interceptor framework is probably low compared to the interceptor implementation mechanism, which is JDK dynamic proxies. If for instance the interceptor were instead implemented using Javassist I think you might have ended up with quite different results. I think your preformance measurements would be even more interesting if you instead implemented the interceptor using Javassist or CGLIB. That would, when compared to the other approaches, give a better indication of the actual overhead imposed by the HiveMind interceptor framework. Regards, --knut --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
