*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
{ Sila lawat Laman Hizbi-Net - http://www.hizbi.net }
{ Hantarkan mesej anda ke: [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
{ Iklan barangan? Hantarkan ke [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
PAS : KE ARAH PEMERINTAHAN ISLAM YANG ADIL
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Assalamualaikum,
Masalah yang timbul daripada Pilihanraya
Presiden menyebabkan rakyatnya mula membincangkan
penggunaan teknologi komputer dan Internet
sebagai alat untuk membuang undi.
Haris forwardkan ini sebagai bahan rujukan
dan perbincangan.
Haris petik perbincangan di ecommerce-discuss
http://www.year2000.com/ecommerce/
Maaf Haris tidak dapat "forward" kan semua
banyak. Sila rujuk laman tu untuk diskusi lain.
Ia bermula daripada Nov 08, 2000.
Haris rasakan kita sudah sepatutnya mula mengkaji
kemungkinan penggunaan teknologi sebegini.
Laman lain untuk rujukan.
http://www.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/00/11/08/001108hnevote.xml
http://www.aceproject.org/main/english/em/emf02/default.htm
http://www.perkel.com/politics/ivote.htm
Atau gunakan kata kunci E-voting untuk mencari laman
lain. http://members.spree.com/sip/hafnie/html/katakunci.html
Wassalam.
: )
--------
Subject: Re: E-Voting
From: "Joel Kahn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 08:21:34 -0600
X-Message-Number: 5
Here's some more discussion of e-voting. The source is:
http://www.aceproject.org/main/english/em/emf02/default.htm
Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) Machines
Direct recording electronic (DRE) machines are computer
terminals that allow voters to enter their votes by
pressing buttons or touching images on a computer screen.
The original DRE machines were simply electronic
implementations of the traditional mechanical lever
machines. More recent DRE models look more like automated
teller machines or personal computers and have the ability
to display photographs as well as text.
DRE machines require a larger up-front investment in
equipment than do punch card and mark-sense systems.
Enough machines must be purchased so that voters need not
wait in line for extended periods of time in order to
vote. In addition, DRE machines must be securely
transported to polling sites and stored between elections.
A well-designed DRE machine can be very easy for a voter
to use and may be more accessible to people who are
illiterate or disabled than punch card and mark-sense
systems. Furthermore, DRE systems ensure that voters make
unambiguous choices; no voter intent disputes can arise.
Because there are no physical ballots that can be
recounted or examined manually, it is essential that DRE
systems be thoroughly tested prior to an election and that
all parties be confident in their proper operation. It is
also essential that votes be recorded on at least two
separate devices so that a backup exists if one should
become corrupted.
Election day power outages are a concern when DRE systems
are used. Systems should be capable of running on
batteries, if necessary for the duration of an election,
or emergency generators, or an alternative voting system
should be available as a backup.
Internet-Based Voting
Voting through personal computers connected to the
Internet is becoming a viable option for some elections.
The Internet may be used simply to transfer ballots from
local precincts to centralised tallying centers. Or
systems may be developed in which voters need not go to
polling places to cast their votes. They may vote from any
computer connected to the Internet. Such Internet vote-
from-home systems might replace a voting station system,
or they might be used only for absentee balloting.
Internet vote-from-home systems are appealing in that they
can eliminate the expenses associated with setting up and
staffing remote voting locations, make voting more
convenient for voters who have computers at home or work,
and eliminate the need for separate absentee ballot
systems. Encryption technology can be used to ensure that
votes cast over the Internet remain secure and private.
Internet vote-from-home systems, however, raise many of
the concerns associated with absentee balloting and vote-
by-mail systems, including concerns about people being
influenced or forced to vote a certain way and concerns
about people selling their right to vote. In addition,
until home computers with Internet access become
ubiquitous, there will still be a need for voting
locations where those who don't have Internet access or
don't know how to use a computer can cast their votes.
Another site with a discussion of electronic voting:
http://www.perkel.com/politics/ivote.htm
I don't have enough faith in the encryption technology to
see Net-voting as being acceptable any time soon.
Joel Kahn
-----
Subject: Re: E-Voting
From: "Tom G. Lanman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 09:16:16 EST
X-Message-Number: 2
David,
You fear the worst. Were you replaced by a computer at
some point in time?
The individual states still have the resources and
manpower to run an election all by themselves. Someone
might have mentioned federal, but you need to get to the
real point here. With the technology we have in computer
usage, those that did vote would have a far better chance
of never screwing up a vote. The person either punches
one button or the computer says back to them "you may
punch only one button for your vote for the president."
Likewise, the computer can tell an individual that he has
not cast a vote in a particular area and further ask if he
wishes to cast a vote in that category at all. Each state
can do this with much more efficiency than the Feds and
the voting would be much more accurate. That would be
proven the first time around. Many more votes would
appear than in past years when so many in each state have
been thrown out.
PEACE...ODAAT (ONE Day AT A Time)
And God Bless You and Yourn'
Tom G. Lanman
---
Subject: Re: E-Voting
From: "David Kimball" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 16:58:18 -0800
X-Message-Number: 1
Excuse me, but the last time I read the Constitution, it
was the States who hold the power of the vote and how to
handle that falls to the individual States. Instituting a
national (Federal) e-voting system is simply whittling
away more individual freedoms to Daddy Government. But
then, our welfare and caretaker mindset has been going
that way for years.
David Kimball
--
Panduan Buat Yang Baru.
http://alpha.skali.net/~hafnie/html/panduan.html
http://www.brainbench.com/transcript.jsp?pid=1732628
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
( Melanggan ? To : [EMAIL PROTECTED] pada body : SUBSCRIBE HIZB)
( Berhenti ? To : [EMAIL PROTECTED] pada body: UNSUBSCRIBE HIZB)
( Segala pendapat yang dikemukakan tidak menggambarkan )
( pandangan rasmi & bukan tanggungjawab HIZBI-Net )
( Bermasalah? Sila hubungi [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Pengirim: "Harisfazillah Jamel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
