Oh..hapi generates this ack message, when i send OUL^R22 message..
Others any clue?..
Is this valid or bug?


On 12 June 2013 20:22, VIOT Yves <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Sorry, i never had to handle such triggers, but if i had to, i will
> produce an ACK - unless the sender doesn't need them.
> In specs, there is no ACK^R22 following de OUL^R22 definition but i can't
> say it's a mistake or not.
>
> Le 12/06/2013 16:46, vijayaratha vijayasingam a écrit :
>
> Hi Viot;
> Sorry i sent different initial sample message ;Please check my later
> replies;
> Im getting following[1] ACK in  MSH-9 filde fro my OUL^R22 message. Is
> that valid?
>  *ACK^R22^ACK|*
>  *
> *
> Thanks
>
>
> On 12 June 2013 17:11, VIOT Yves <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  Hi,
>> This is valid
>> Here is what you can find in the HL7 2.5 documentation, following the
>> ADT^A01^ADT_A01 messages structure definition.
>> ACK^A01^ACK
>> To get rid of it just get the MSH-9-1 with the terser.
>>
>> Yves
>>
>>  Le 12/06/2013 13:25, vijayaratha vijayasingam a écrit :
>>
>>  Hi all;
>> Anyone have clue..?:(
>> I badly need this to sort out..
>> thanks
>>
>>
>> On 12 June 2013 15:31, vijayaratha vijayasingam <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all;
>>> Im using Hapi 2.1 version release an dit works perfect. But i have an
>>> issue with an error response which i get from Hapi.
>>> My request is;
>>> MSH|^~\&|||||20130612143324.392+0530||ADT^A01^ADT_A01|2601|T|2.5
>>>
>>>  And My response is;
>>>  MSH|^~\&|||||20130612152510.448+0530||ACK^A01^ACK|1623|T|2.5
>>> MSA|AE|2601
>>> ERR|||207^Application internal error^HL70357^^^^^^OOPS|E
>>>
>>>
>>>  In the above response , if you check the MSH-9 filed , it is;
>>>
>>>  *ACK^A01^ACK
>>> *
>>>
>>>  Shouldn't that be "|ACK". because it is additionaly adding "*AO1*" message 
>>> to
>>> that filed, which is not valid. And i suspect that , it picks from that
>>> from original request.
>>>
>>>  Can anybody help me on this? Ho w can i avoid that invalid segment?
>>> Why Hapi additionally adds that filed in the MSH-9 filed?
>>>
>>>  Thanks
>>> -ratha
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>   
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>>
>> Build for Windows Store.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hl7api-devel mailing 
>> [email protected]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hl7api-devel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>>
>> Build for Windows Store.
>>
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hl7api-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hl7api-devel
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>
> Build for Windows Store.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Hl7api-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hl7api-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Hl7api-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hl7api-devel

Reply via email to