Well, according to the standard - section 4.4.4, it is stated that the BLG
segment is optional. I think there might be a bug, in that it seems that
the parser does not respect the rule stated at Page 2-7, section 2.5.2:
"... *As of v 2.5, the first segment in a newly defined segment group will
be required to help ensure that unparsable messages will not be
inadvertently defined. ...*"
- Which means that a PID segment would have been required if the second ORC
should have belonged to the prior results.
IMHO, this is a bug in HAPI.
Perhaps James Agnew or Christian Ohr would care to comment on this?
On 8 November 2012 12:17, Søren Therkildsen <
soren.heintzelmann.therkild...@systematic.com> wrote:
> I am using 2.0.1
>
> Jens Kristian Villadsen <jkv@...> writes:
>
> >
> >
> > What version of HAPI are you using?
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov
> _______________________________________________
> Hl7api-devel mailing list
> Hl7api-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hl7api-devel
>
--
Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards
*Jens Kristian Villadsen*
cand.polyt
Kantorvænget nr. 161
8240 Risskov
Denmark
Mobile +4523373806
jenskristianvillad...@gmail.com
jkiddo.dyndns.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov
_______________________________________________
Hl7api-devel mailing list
Hl7api-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hl7api-devel
