Thanks Christian,
That solved my problem but I'm still curious about overriding the default
validation, is it possible to override the predicate that is set in the
DefaultValidationWithoutTNBuilder? For example, for a specific segment, if I
am interested in allowing a space in the TN field using the predicate
matches(String), I find that the compiler continues to complain at the calling
of the super. Eg.
<code>
public class newValidation extends DefaultValidationWithoutTNBuilder{
@Override
protected void configure(){
super.configure();
forAllVersions().message("ADT","A01").terser("MSH-6",matches(".*"));
}}
</code>
I get a compile time error about failing a primitive for date-time.
Is there an easy way to override the default primitive?
Many thanks for your help.
Andrew
From: Christian Ohr [mailto:christian....@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 23 September 2013 5:22 PM
To: Andrew Bowden
Cc: hl7api-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [HAPI-devel] HAPI 2.1 and overriding validation
Hi Andrew,
note that there is only a (primitive) validation for TN, not for XTN, in
DefaultValidationBuilder.
And, there is the DefaultValidationWithoutTNBuilder for exactly the reason you
mentioned. So subclass this builder instead.
Hope this helps
Christian
2013/9/23 Andrew Bowden
<andrew.bow...@rch.org.au<mailto:andrew.bow...@rch.org.au>>
Hi there,
I have recently started using HAPI and am impressed by the amount of function
in the toolkit. I have been struggling for about a week with the correct way
to override the validation and am hoping that someone on this list can help me.
I have a segment that fails validation for an XTN type (as I am out of the US),
I would like to keep validation on but change the validation for this segment.
I realize that I can turn off validation for the message but am curious as to
the best way to approach this problem.
I have tried the HAPI by example method of extending the
DefaultValidationBuilder and overriding the configure method, however the first
call to super overrides the rule that I have provided to the method. I have
also seen an example of extending the ValidationContextImpl
(http://osdir.com/ml/medical.hl7/2008-07/msg00003.html), but this appears to be
an older approach to the problem.
I would appreciate any help that can be provided to point me in the right
direction.
Andrew
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Hl7api-devel mailing list
Hl7api-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:Hl7api-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hl7api-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Hl7api-devel mailing list
Hl7api-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hl7api-devel
