-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I like how there is still no response to this. These changes are greatly needed, but Valve just chooses which emails to ignore... An affirmative "no this isn't happening" would suffice instead of ignoring it altogether.
On 10/27/05, Ignacio MartÃn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It would be nice to see at least some some of these requets in the > future SDK update. > I would add another thing: > A detailed log of at least which files have been added/changed to be > able to update our mods codebase. > ;) > > > 2005/10/27, Pierre-Marie Baty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > As Jeremy says: > > "At the very least can we get some sort of response this time?" > > > > A yes, a no, a not now but later, but a response. It's been the fourth > or > > fifth time this request is politely submitted to you, and I never even > > imagined it could be ignored like that. Am I missing the point ? Are we > > requesting something unimaginable, extraordinary, or frankly insulting > to > > you ? Or is it simply politically incorrect ? > > > > We need to know if the time and energy we have spent and are still > spending > > writing advanced bot frameworks for HL2 is being wasted in vain. > > > > Thank you for your response. > > > > -- > > Pierre-Marie Baty > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders > > -- _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
