By the way, there already is a member function for this. It's called NormalizeInPlace()
At 2006/03/05 11:15 PM, John Sheu wrote: >On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 00:02 -0500, Jorge Rodriguez wrote: >> Presumably they can answer my question, because one of them removed the >> function and knows why it was done. I expect that the answer is that >> returning a pass-by-reference copy constructed Vector is much slower >> then normalizing the Vector in place, and they wanted to force >> programmers to use the faster function by removing the old one. Or, if >> they have another explination that works, I'd be happy too. Nobody on >> this list has answered the "why" part of my question, they've just given >> me cruft that I already know. > >I presume that if you've already answered your own question, there's no >point in asking it. > > >_______________________________________________ >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please >visit: >http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
