> Why is this so definately "malarky"? You don't think its > possible that > through a higher level of error checking you could introduce several > (15-20) milliseconds of additional latency? I don't think its utterly > ridiculous as a possibility. Error checking and correction built into the TCP/IP protocol, and is handled at the receiving host. There is no error checking of packets by routers. StanTheMan TheHardwareFreak www.hardwarefreak.devastation.cc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: [OT] Qwest + 678 Stan Hoeppner
- RE: [OT] Qwest + 678 Chuck Hays
- RE: [OT] Qwest + 678 Stan Hoeppner
- RE: [OT] Qwest + 678 Chuck Hays
- Re: [OT] Qwest + 678 Sysop
- Re: [OT] Qwest + 678 Wrath_of_Ace
- RE: [OT] Qwest + 678 Stan Hoeppner
- RE: [OT] Qwest + 678 Stan Hoeppner
- Re: [OT] Qwest + 678 Sysop
- RE: [OT] Qwest + 678 Stan Hoeppner
- Re: [OT] Qwest + 678 Sysop
- RE: [OT] Qwest + 678 Stan Hoeppner
- Re: [OT] Qwest + 678 Sysop

