I would begin to wonder if this was the first time this happened.  But, in
the past 6 months, I'd say this is like the 3rd or 4th time.  I dunno who is
in charge of their systems, but, I'd really consider hiring someone more
qualified.  Even the name Deacon rings a bell...

HoundDawg
http://www.phpGamingSite.com
http://www.unitedadmins.com
http://www.unitedadmins.com/hlbp
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan McCullough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 3:21 PM
Subject: RE: Nondeliverable mail


>
> Sorry or this post guys. I got a little frustrated with some 800
> nondeliverable messages. Sorry for the harsh statements. I was just a
little
> edgy this morning. Going back to work after a nice vacation you didnt want
> to leave can do that.
>
> -Ryan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan McCullough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 10:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Nondeliverable mail
>
>
>
> Jesus H Christ. I don't normally take the lords name in vain, but
> damn. This is bs. I showed up today after being on vacation this weekend
and
> found 850 emails in my hlds folder and 250 in my hlds_linux folder. I
> usually just go with this, run my purge rule on messages from
> postmaster/mail admin/etc.. and be done, but 850! After purging I am left
> with 280 messages. That means there was close to 500 emails from mail
admin.
> I know you have said this cannot be fixed valve, but come on. I can't tell
> you what to do, but I would think the admin headaches from this problem
> would be enough to at least look into other options or re-evaluate the way
> email is handled. Whats worse is this will all go into the archive. What a
> waste. Oh well, I guess it does no good for me to whine about. If you are
> going to change anything, what happened this morning should be reason
> enough.
>
> -Ryan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Cassaday [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 4:04 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Nondeliverable mail
>
>
>
> either way... no
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kevin J. Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 2:17 AM
> Subject: Re: Nondeliverable mail
>
>
> >
> > dont you mean exponential loop?
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "CP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 1:40 AM
> > Subject: Re: Nondeliverable mail
> >
> >
> > |
> > | Don't you love how it's an infinite loop?
> > |
> > | Chris
> > | ----- Original Message -----
> > | From: "Stan Hoeppner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > | To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > | Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 8:24 PM
> > | Subject: RE: Nondeliverable mail
> > |
> > |
> > | >
> > | > Ok, this is getting out of hand.  Time to dig into Exchange...
> > | >
> > | > Stan
> > | >
> > | > > -----Original Message-----
> > | > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > | > > Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 6:27 PM
> > | > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > | > > Subject: Nondeliverable mail
> > | > >
> > | > >
> > | > > ------Transcript of session follows -------
> > | > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > | > > The intended recipient's mailbox is full.
> > | > >
> > | > >
> > | > >
> > | > >
> > | >
> > | >
> > | >
> > |
> > |
> >
> >
>
>
>
>


Reply via email to