A) ... B) Signature is required by the company. It is also applied by our mail filter server and has to be applied. I can not control this stampage of the signature. Well, I could but im not allowed. How I use my resources at work is my business. Considering that this email address is the easiest form for me to access then it's the most suitable. These topics are a during work hours thing for me. I have as much right as anyone else to this list.
C) As useless as you may think, its there for some reason. The reasoning is something that I cant control. Have you emailed anyone that works at the banks lately? They also have the same thing along with many other companies. Its not something that they send to each employee and tell them to add this as their personal signature. F) A question answered was all that was required. G) I think we've all said too much on this topic.... -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 3:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds] RE: hlds digest, Vol 1 #2825 - mess 14 [OT] <troll.on> A) Responding to a digest thread = another no-no. B) Required by his company? Why is he using their resources to access this list? The disclaimer absolutely does not pertain to this list. C) I did read the sig before I posted. I was amazed, line by line, how completely useless it was and that any companies still utilize things like this. that is one reason I opted to respond, though I knew someone would accuse me of flaming or trolling. It's not about that, it's about letting people know when something is not appropriate. D) Disclaimers on emails are less effective than EULAs. They hold NO legal weight. Confidentiallty disclaimers on emails are antiquated and ineffective. E) That special olympics thing was old in 1998, and as overused and useless now as... email confidentiality disclaimers. F) I answered his question, didn't I? <troll.off> --- Clay Gravil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually... > > I can think of many more polite ways to say something about it... > But this is not the issue. > > If you READ his signature you'd understand that it's a disclaimer... > and for > his company it NEEDS to be there. He may not even have a way of > disabling > it. At my work every email that is sent externally has that type of > sig, I > can disable it but that's because I'm an IT staffer with the privys > to do > so... users usually can't. > > So a response like yours was out of line, didn't add ANYTHING to the > issue > at hand and neither <unfortunately> did mine. When I saw your > response the > first thing that popped to mind was "troll". This list DON'T need > trolls. > YOU are not a troll, so PLEASE don't act like one. I'm finished and > done. > > If you have more to say about this ... > Please check here before doing so... > http://carcino.gen.nz/images/image.php/463c5922/arguing.jpg > > > > Message: 14 > Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 00:12:15 -0700 (PDT) > From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [hlds] CZ 1.2 Server lag > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Well, the fact that your sig was there means you are ignorant or > disrespectful of common courteousy, so someone is going to tell you > regardless. Politely ignoring it will not help anyone. So yes, my > comment > did help something, maybe it didn't answer your question, but someone > was > going to mention it. > > I think I was much more polite than some of the people might have > been. > > > The answer to your question is yes, btw. > > --- Brian McAlpine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And comments like that are always helpful to the question at hand. > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.690 / Virus Database: 451 - Release Date: 22-May-04 > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds Attention: This e-mail is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please delete the message and notify the sender. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author. This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by William Angliss Institute of TAFE The First Choice www.angliss.vic.edu.au PRIVACY DECLARATION: Personal Information collected and/or held by William Angliss Institute will only be used for the purpose for which it was collected or otherwise in accordance with the National Privacy Principles (NPPs) a summary of which is on display around the institute and available on request. William Angliss Institute will hold this information securely, and will only disclose personal information in accordance with its Information Privacy Policy (available at http://www.angliss.vic.edu.au). If you would like to request access to your personal information or find out more about how William Angliss Institute respects your right to privacy, please contact the Institute Privacy Officer on 9606.2240 or by email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________________________________________________________ William Angliss Institute of TAFE 555 LaTrobe Street Melbourne 3000 AUSTRALIA ph: +61 3 9606 2111 ABN 66 266 583 978 CRICOS Provider Code: 01505M The First Choice http://www.angliss.vic.edu.au _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
