This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
Even the 2.67 P4 is doing better, in terms of clock speed it is only a little faster
than one of the chips, but this is a dual, if we look at amd's naming system then
2400+ should as you say be eqivilant to a p4 2.4, but im just not seeing the
performance especially considering it has an extra chip over the p4's.
Neil.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of List Keeper
Sent: Wed 28/07/2004 17:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel.
Also it should be noted that the 2400+ was only meant to be compete with a 2.4
GHz Intel CPU, not the 2.8 or 3.0 GHz that you are using.
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 11:31 AM
Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
Well to be fair the P4's are all 800FSB, using PC400 ram. Compared to the
mp2400's which only run PC2100 ram, and the fsb is 266.
Both CPU's are being used, and on my original test both cpu's were at 100% on
the dual.
I agree that 2 single chip systems compared to a dual, will generally bring
more performance (in my case a p4 3ghz and a p4 2.8ghz), but at the moment i have my
p4 3ghz outperforming my dual by nearly double in terms of cpu usage. Which just seems
odd. I will be doing some more testing this evening to get the p4 under really heavy
load and see how the ingame playability differs between the dual and the p4. I will be
attempting to get 60+ people on the p4 this eve spread over some big servers, ill
report back the results.
The 2400's are thoroughbred.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David Fencik
Sent: Wed 28/07/2004 17:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel.
We need to get back to the original focus of this thread. Was the
chipset on the amd boards specified?
It wouldn't be fair if you were comparing a P4 with DDR 333 to an Athlon
mp with DDR 233, would it? I'm just saying that there are other parts
of the machine to consider besides the processor speed.
Also...2 single processor machines are superior to 1 dual processor
machine in overall cpu usage. Mapchange, however, is a different story.
This may sound silly, but have you verified that both cpus are being
used by the operating system by looking for two processors in the task
manager?
I am not loyal to either brand. I have both brands of chips and I
realize that both intel and amd have made some good and some bad ones.
Are your 2400's thoroughbred or barton cores?
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of K. Mike Bradley
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 11:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel.
Each process will only run on separate CPU if you set the apps processor
affinity.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Maarten van der
Zwaart
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 7:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel.
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:18:11 +0100, Mark Duffy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Dumb question but does the software (mods and game) actually support
> multi processors?????
Yes, meaning they will run on such a system. But each HLDS instance will
only run on one processor.
Maarten
--
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
--
[ winmail.dat of type application/ms-tnef deleted ]
--
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
